Question about the convergence of a series

Amaelle
Messages
309
Reaction score
54
Homework Statement
look at the image
Relevant Equations
Assymptotic approximation
Greetings!

I have a question about one assumption regarding this question even though I agree with the answer but I have a doubt about A, because
when we study the convergence of a serie we use the assymptotic approximation, so why A is not correct?
thank you!
when we
1644485755446.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Exactly how is ##a_n## ~ ##b_n## defined? Is ##1/n## ~ ##1/n^2##?
 
  • Like
Likes Amaelle and pbuk
FactChecker said:
Is ##1/n## ~ ##1/n^2##?

My Italian isn't great but I think in the context of the question this works better as: Does ## \frac 1 {n ^ 2} \sim \frac 1 n ## as ## n \to +\infty ##?
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and Amaelle
pbuk said:
My Italian isn't great but I think in the context of the question this works better as: Does ## \frac 1 {n ^ 2} \sim \frac 1 n ## as ## n \to +\infty ##?
I think they mean something like log (1+1/n) ≈ 1/n , this why I´m asking
 
FactChecker said:
Exactly how is ##a_n## ~ ##b_n## defined? Is ##1/n## ~ ##1/n^2##?

This is the issue.

If it means <br /> \lim_{n \to \infty} |a_n - b_n| \to 0 then indeed 1/n \sim 1/n^2 and convergence of \sum a_n tells us nothing about the convergence of \sum b_n.

However, to my mind a_n \sim b_n as n \to \infty means <br /> \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{|a_n - b_n|}{|a_n|} \to 0. One can show that if a_n \sim b_n in this sense then there exists N \in \mathbb{N} such that <br /> \left| \sum_{n=N}^M b_n - \sum_{n=N}^M a_n \right| <br /> &lt; \frac12 \sum_{n=N}^M |a_n|<br /> for all M \geq N, and it follows that if \sum a_n converges absolutely then \sum b_n converges absolutely. However I have not been able to show that if \sum a_n converges but not absolutely then \sum b_n converges, but nor have I found a counterexample.
 
  • Love
Likes Amaelle
Amaelle said:
I think they mean something like log (1+1/n) ≈ 1/n , this why I´m asking
Yes I can see that. The point is that ## a_n = \frac 1 {n ^ 2}, b_n = \frac 1 n ## is a counter-example that makes statement A incorrect because we have ## a_n \sim b_n ## as ## n \to +\infty ## and we have ## \Sigma a_n ## converging to ## 2 ## but ## \Sigma b_n = \Sigma \frac 1 n ## diverges.

This all assumes an interpretation of ## a_n \sim b_n ## similar to @pasmith's first one. I read it like this:
$$ a_n \sim b_n \text { as } n \to +\infty \iff \forall (\varepsilon > 0) \ \exists N : \forall (n > N) \ |a_n - b_n| < \varepsilon $$
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes FactChecker and Amaelle
pbuk said:
Yes I can see that. The point is that ## a_n = \frac 1 {n ^ 2}, b_n = \frac 1 n ## is a counter-example that makes statement A incorrect because we have ## a_n \sim b_n ## as ## n \to +\infty ## and we have ## \Sigma a_n ## converging to ## 2 ## but ## \Sigma b_n = \Sigma \frac 1 n ## diverges.

This all assumes an interpretation of ## a_n \sim b_n ## similar to @pasmith's first one. I read it like this:
$$ a_n \sim b_n \text { as } n \to +\infty \iff \forall (\varepsilon > 0) \ \exists N : \forall (n > N) \ |a_n - b_n| < \varepsilon $$
amazing explanation thanks a million!
 
Amaelle said:
I think they mean something like log (1+1/n) ≈ 1/n , this why I´m asking
You need to determine exactly what the book with the problem means by '~'. If the book leaves it vague, then A is false. And if the book says that it means ##lim_{n\to\infty} |a_n-b_n| = 0##, A is false.
 
I think the problem here is that in order to use the criteria for convergence the terms of the series must be NON negative,which is not assumed in statement A. Otherwise you would have to check for the absolute convergence of the series.
 
  • Love
Likes Amaelle
  • #10
Davide97 said:
I think the problem here is that in order to use the criteria for convergence the terms of the series must be NON negative,which is not assumed in statement A. Otherwise you would have to check for the absolute convergence of the series.
thanks a million!
 
  • #11
Davide97 said:
I think the problem here is that in order to use the criteria for convergence the terms of the series must be NON negative,which is not assumed in statement A. Otherwise you would have to check for the absolute convergence of the series.
Statement A does not only fail where terms approaching ## n \to \infty ## may be negative: an example with strictly positive terms for both series was given in #3.
 
  • Love
Likes Amaelle
  • #12
I see now, thanks a million for your feedback!
 
Back
Top