Question about the Limit of x^n/(n)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter student34
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the limit of the expression x^n/(n!) as n approaches infinity, particularly examining the behavior of this limit when x is treated as a variable that can also grow with n. Participants explore the implications of fixing x versus allowing both x and n to increase simultaneously, leading to different interpretations of the limit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the limit of x^n/(n!) as n approaches infinity equals 0 for fixed x, using the ratio test to support this claim.
  • Another participant clarifies that the limit must be evaluated with x fixed, arguing that changing both n and x leads to a different limit, specifically lim n→∞ n^n/(n!), which behaves differently.
  • A participant expresses confusion about how n! can be larger than x^n, noting that their observations seem counterintuitive and that they mistakenly interchanged "difference" with "ratio" in their explanation.
  • One participant reflects on their struggle to comprehend the concept of infinity and its implications in this context, suggesting that understanding infinity is complex and not easily grasped with finite reasoning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the limit should be evaluated with x fixed, but there is disagreement regarding the implications of allowing both x and n to grow. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the intuitive understanding of infinity and its impact on the limit behavior.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the limitations of finite thinking when grappling with the concept of infinity, suggesting that this may contribute to misunderstandings about the behavior of the limit.

student34
Messages
639
Reaction score
21
My textbook explains how the limit of x^n/(n!) as n→∞ equals 0, x ∈ ℝ. Since a(n) = x^n/(n!) and a(n+1) = x^(n+1)/((n+1)n!) and (a(n+1))/a(n) = x/(n+1) and lim n→∞ x/(n+1) = 0, then it seems obvious.

But, I went on Wolfram Alpha and I noticed that when I made x = n and put in some large values, x^n increased much faster than n! did. Is this just one of those weird outcomes of using infinity? Or why does infinity change the regularity of the sequence so much to the point that they invert?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\lim_{n \to \infty} {x^n \over n!}## means that you fix x and see what happens when n becomes very large. You don't get to change n and x at the same time.

You didn't keep n fixed, which means you ended up calculating ##\lim_{n \to \infty} {n^n \over n!}## instead. That is a very different problem.

Here's a simpler example to illustrate what I'm talking about. You wrote: ##\lim_{n \to \infty} {x \over n+1} = 0##. But if you put in ##x = n## and let both become large, you'll get a sequence approaching 1, not 0. If you're not taking a limit with respect to a symbol, then you need to leave it fixed.
 
eigenperson said:
##\lim_{n \to \infty} {x^n \over n!}## means that you fix x and see what happens when n becomes very large. You don't get to change n and x at the same time.

You didn't keep n fixed, which means you ended up calculating ##\lim_{n \to \infty} {n^n \over n!}## instead. That is a very different problem.

Here's a simpler example to illustrate what I'm talking about. You wrote: ##\lim_{n \to \infty} {x \over n+1} = 0##. But if you put in ##x = n## and let both become large, you'll get a sequence approaching 1, not 0. If you're not taking a limit with respect to a symbol, then you need to leave it fixed.

I know that I am not suppose to fix n. I just wanted to see how x^n/n! looks as n and x increase. I did this because it is very counterintuitive to me how n! can ever be larger than x^n.

For example lim n→∞ 1000/(7n) = 0 is obvious because we can see that the ratio of 1000/7n decreases as n gets larger. This does not at all happen when I increase x and n values for x^n/(n!). In fact, the ratio increases as n and x get larger.

*I made a big mistake. I edited out "difference" and put in "ratio" instead.
 
Last edited:
Never mind; this whole thing is dumb. I realize that 2x/n does the same thing as x and n get larger. I guess it's just my brain having a tough time with understanding how big infinity is or what infinity is.
 
Don't beat yourself up too much.

Infinity is not actually an easy thing to understand: it's only been roughly the last one hundred years that infinity is being explored (and it still is being explored today in many ways).

In some ways infinity is intuitive and in other ways it is not if you still try and make sense of it using finite thinking and its very easy to resort to finite thinking due to many of our experiences and senses living in the finite domain.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K