B Question about the Silicon-burning Process beyond iron

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter DrLich
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exothermic
AI Thread Summary
The silicon-burning process remains exothermic beyond iron due to the fusion of alpha particles with heavier nuclei, which continues to release energy despite decreasing energy output with each step. While iron is the endpoint for significant energy release in stellar fusion, the binding energy of silicon and tin allows for energy generation through intermediate reactions. The binding energy per nucleon peaks at iron, but the addition of alpha particles, which have a lower binding energy, still results in net energy release up to tin-116. This process illustrates that energy can be produced even when the resulting nuclei have lower binding energy per nucleon than the starting materials. Ultimately, while the production of elements beyond nickel is minimal, the fusion process can still yield energy until reaching tin.
DrLich
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
I came across an article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon-burning_process) that claims the silicon-burning process remains exothermic all the way to tin-100. Although iron is the endpoint for energy release in stellar fusion, how does the process continue to be exothermic beyond iron?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The silicon burning process adds alpha particles to successively more massive nuclei, building up sulfur, argon, calcium, titanium, chromium, iron, and then nickel. However, this process also results in less and less energy being released each time. Combine this with increasing amounts of photodisintegration as the core grows hotter and you reach a point where no significant amount of elements beyond nickel-56 can be created from fusion anymore. At least in this specific chain. There are probably a small amount of heavier elements created, but the star won't generate huge quantities of it compared to the amount of nickel and iron created.

DrLich said:
how does the process continue to be exothermic beyond iron?
The details are beyond me, but the fact is that fusing an alpha particle to a heavier nucleus continues to release energy past iron and nickel.
 
So, I can't see anything relevant after (admittedly only) skimming the sources given for the claim in the Wikipedia article.
The best justification for the statement I can think of is that the binding energy of silicon and tin are about on the same level, so if you sort of start with silicon and end with tin, treating everything in-between as intermediate steps in the reaction, you still end up with a nett release in energy by the time you get to tin.
I'm not sure that's physically relevant, though.
 
The answer is that while the binding energy per nucleon peaks at Fe (8.79032 MeV), the binding energy per nucleon of an alpha particle is much lower at 7.074 MeV. So the average binding energy of Fe + He is (4 * He + 56 * Fe) / 60.0 = 8.676 MeV, which is lower than the binding energy per nucleon of Ni, which is 8.76502 MeV. So the reaction 56Fe + 4He -> 60Ni generates energy, even though the product of 60Ni has a lower binding energy per nucleon than 56Fe. This continue to be true up to about 116Sn. In essence the energy is coming from the more loosely bound alpha particle.
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith, Bandersnatch and DrLich
At tin, (4 * He + 116 * Sn) / 120.0 = 8.4748 MeV, which is basically equal to 120Te at 8.47814 MeV.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top