Undergrad Question about the solution of TISE (finite potential barrier)

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the solutions to the wave function for a finite potential barrier, specifically the equation a sin(kx) + b cos(kx) = 0. It is clarified that while coefficients a and b can be individually zero, having both non-zero is possible, particularly in the general solution Psi(x) = a exp(i.k.x) + b exp(-i.k.x). The continuity conditions yield four relations, and the physical interpretation of the coefficients relates to reflection and transmission amplitudes. However, in scenarios involving an incident particle with energy less than the potential, only five coefficients are relevant, as the sixth will be zero due to the absence of incoming waves from the right. The discussion emphasizes the importance of these coefficients in understanding tunneling phenomena and suggests further reading for detailed treatment.
Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13
79.png

Let's say the solution on the left hand side is a sinkx + b coskx = 0
We get one solution for each E if we omitted a and another solution if we omitted b. However, how to conclude that they are all the solutions? Will there be any solution of the 5 coefficients such that a and b are both not zero?
Thank you
 

Attachments

  • 79.png
    79.png
    33.2 KB · Views: 904
Physics news on Phys.org
Clara Chung said:
Let's say the solution on the left hand side is a sinkx + b coskx = 0

If you are dealing with a physical situation, the five coefficients are necessary- however, the continuity condition gives you four relations;
Therefore the ratio of coefficients with incident amplitude carries physical interpretations-like reflection, transmission.etc.
making a and b both zero does not carry any meaning.
moreover, the total wave function can be zero on the left side if there is infinite wall
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
drvrm said:
If you are dealing with a physical situation, the five coefficients are necessary- however, the continuity condition gives you four relations;
Therefore the ratio of coefficients with incident amplitude carries physical interpretations-like reflection, transmission.etc.
making a and b both zero does not carry any meaning.
moreover, the total wave function can be zero on the left side if there is infinite wall
Sorry, but I mean will there be solution where a and b are both NOT zero?
 
Clara Chung said:
Sorry, but I mean will there be a solution where a and b are both NOT zero?

yes, such solutions exist on the left of the potential barrier- gen solution is
Psi(x) =a exp( i.k.x) +b exp(- i.k.x)
where
k = Sqrt( 2mE)/ h_bar
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
drvrm said:
yes, such solutions exist on the left of the potential barrier- gen solution is
Psi(x) =a exp( i.k.x) +b exp(- i.k.x)
where
k = Sqrt( 2mE)/ h_bar
yes, but I mean is it possible for all 6 coefficients be non zero?
 
Clara Chung said:
yes, but I mean is it possible for all 6 coefficients be non zero?

When one is treating the problem from the view of a particle incident from left with E, < V(x) you can have only five constants

say {A.B} {C.D } and E in the three regions as there will be transmitted amplitude in the third region.- the most interesting is (E/A)
physically as it represents tunneling. As no wave is coming from right the sixth amplitude will be zero.

depending on the energy and corresponding width of the barrier certain approximations can be made.
pl. see the detailed treatment in the reference below-that may help you.

Ref.-http://www.cse.salford.ac.uk/physics/gsmcdonald/pp/PPLATOResources/h-flap/p11_1t.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K