Question about the William Herschel Telescope's new "Weave" device

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter phinds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Device
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The William Herschel Telescope (WHT) has introduced a new multifibre spectroscopy instrument, enhancing its observational capabilities. This technology, previously utilized at other telescopes like the Anglo-Australian Telescope (AAT) and UK Schmidt, allows for simultaneous spectral data collection from multiple stars without the risk of spectral overlap. The complexity of the equipment is offset by the potential for easier automation in data gathering once calibrated, marking a significant advancement in astronomical observation techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multifibre spectroscopy techniques
  • Familiarity with the William Herschel Telescope (WHT)
  • Knowledge of the Anglo-Australian Telescope (AAT) and UK Schmidt telescopes
  • Basic principles of spectral data analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the operational principles of multifibre spectroscopy
  • Explore the advancements in telescope technology at the Anglo-Australian Observatory
  • Learn about the calibration processes for astronomical instruments
  • Investigate the automation techniques used in modern astronomical data collection
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysics researchers, and anyone interested in advancements in telescope technology and data collection methods in astronomy.

phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
19,378
Reaction score
15,612
TL;DR
question about an article regarding the William Herschel Telescope's new "Weave" device
This article

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-62321537

makes it sounds like quite a big deal and if the description is accurate then that seems like a reasonable characterization, however I have little to no knowledge to base any judgment on AND this is a pop-science type of description and I have no faith in those at even though they DO occasionally get things (or at least most things) right. So ... I'm wondering if anyone here can give me a better idea of how important these observations will be.

Thanks

Paul
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN and collinsmark
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, collinsmark and phinds
It does sound pretty cool.

I can imagine the advantages of such a system.
(a) You can gather spectral data for different stars in parallel.
(b) Unlike traditional spectoscopy (which can also measure different stars in parallel), there is no risk of overlap of different star spectrum (i.e., produces better data).
(c) Although the equipment is more complicated, the data gathering is probably a lot easier to automate, once everything is set up and calibrated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 118 ·
4
Replies
118
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
16K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
14K