I Question about the William Herschel Telescope's new "Weave" device

  • Thread starter Thread starter phinds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Device
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the significance of the new "Weave" instrument for the William Herschel Telescope (WHT), which enhances multifibre spectroscopy capabilities. Participants note that while the instrument is innovative, similar techniques have been previously developed and utilized at other observatories. The advantages of the Weave system include the ability to gather spectral data from multiple stars simultaneously without spectral overlap, leading to improved data quality. Additionally, the complexity of the equipment may facilitate easier automation of data collection after initial setup and calibration. Overall, the Weave device represents a meaningful advancement in astronomical observation techniques.
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
19,373
Reaction score
15,585
TL;DR
question about an article regarding the William Herschel Telescope's new "Weave" device
This article

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-62321537

makes it sounds like quite a big deal and if the description is accurate then that seems like a reasonable characterization, however I have little to no knowledge to base any judgment on AND this is a pop-science type of description and I have no faith in those at even though they DO occasionally get things (or at least most things) right. So ... I'm wondering if anyone here can give me a better idea of how important these observations will be.

Thanks

Paul
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman, collinsmark and phinds
Thanks
 
It does sound pretty cool.

I can imagine the advantages of such a system.
(a) You can gather spectral data for different stars in parallel.
(b) Unlike traditional spectoscopy (which can also measure different stars in parallel), there is no risk of overlap of different star spectrum (i.e., produces better data).
(c) Although the equipment is more complicated, the data gathering is probably a lot easier to automate, once everything is set up and calibrated.
 
"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 118 ·
4
Replies
118
Views
12K