Question about uncertainty princple?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the uncertainty principle (HUP) in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to measuring the components of angular momentum of particles. Participants explore the relationship between measuring one component and the uncertainty of the others, as well as a separate inquiry into the potential energy of electric charges at varying distances.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that measuring the z-component of a particle's angular momentum to be zero does not allow for a definitive conclusion about the x and y components, which could also be zero or not.
  • Others argue that measuring a total angular momentum of zero does not violate the uncertainty principle, citing examples such as S-orbitals in hydrogen atoms that have exactly zero angular momentum.
  • A participant questions how to measure the angular momentum of S orbitals, suggesting the Stern–Gerlach experiment as a possible method.
  • Another participant raises a question regarding the potential energy of two static electric charges at a distance and how it changes with a slight increase in distance, expressing uncertainty about the new potential energy value.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of measuring angular momentum components and the relationship to the uncertainty principle. The discussion on potential energy also remains unresolved, with participants seeking clarification on calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about the measurements of angular momentum and the potential energy calculations, which depend on the definitions and conditions set by the participants.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
Lets say I measure the z-component of a particles angular momentum, then I can't know for certain the x and y componets. So if I measure the Z componet to be 0, the x and y componets could be zero or not.
So is it impossible to say that the particles total angular mometum is zero meaning all the componets are zero. Would this violate the uncertainty principle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:
Lets say I measure the z-component of a particles angular momentum, then I can't know for certain the x and y componets. So if I measure the Z componet to be 0, the x and y componets could be zero or not.
So is it impossible to say that the particles total angular mometum is zero meaning all the componets are zero. Would this violate the uncertainty principle?

No, as you do not know what the values are. That is what the principle means. They COULD be zero, or they might not be.
 
so i could measure one of the components at it could be zero but I won't know what the other components are .
 
I have a question that has to do with HUP ---- at least i suppose.
Let say we have two unity electric charge far way from each other in a distance D= 3.481*10^7 They are in static position. THe potential energy of them is E = e^2 / D *eps.0 = h/1 erg.
Let suppose that will have another distance D1 = D+1 cm. I am in dilema to know how will be the potential energy: < h/1 or 0?
 
So is it impossible to say that the particles total angular mometum is zero meaning all the componets are zero. Would this violate the uncertainty principle?

No, that's not true; measuring precisely 0 total angular momentum does not violate the uncertainty principle. For example, the S-orbitals in a hydrogen atom have exactly 0 angular momentum. This is allowed because the commutators for angular momentum have the "strange" form,

[tex] [L_x, L_y] = i\hbar L_z[/tex]
[tex] [L_y, L_z] = i \hbar L_x[/tex]
[tex] [L_z, L_x] = i \hbar L_y[/tex]

And as you know, the uncertainty principle between two operators depends on the commutator:

[tex] \Delta A \Delta B = \frac{1}{2} |[A, B]|[/tex]

So if all components are zero, they all can be measured simultaneously.

For nonzero L, by contrast, L2 and Lz can be measured simultaneously, and from there you can deduce how much of the rest is distributed among Lx and Ly, but it is impossible to go further and resolve the two individual components.
 
Last edited:
ok thanks for you answer mike . And how do we measure the angular momentum of the S orbital in the hydrogen atom? Would we just do the Stern–Gerlach experiment?
 
Last edited:
mquirce said:
I have a question that has to do with HUP ---- at least i suppose.
Let say we have two unity electric charge far way from each other in a distance D= 3.481*10^7 They are in static position. THe potential energy of them is E = e^2 / D *eps.0 = h/1 erg.
Let suppose that will have another distance D1 = D+1 cm. I am in dilema to know how will be the potential energy: < h/1 or 0?

Did you do the math with the new distance? What is the new value?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K