Question for stability of negative feedback OP-AMP

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the stability of negative feedback in operational amplifiers (OP-AMPs), particularly in the context of a voltage follower configuration. It highlights that while the closed-loop gain (Acl) is 1, the open-loop gain (Aol) can lead to transient behavior where Vout initially diverges before stabilizing. A key point is that the output does not instantaneously reach the new input value due to the finite response time of the OP-AMP, resulting in a gradual approach to equilibrium. The conversation emphasizes that negative feedback ultimately stabilizes the system by allowing Vout to settle at a value very close to Vin, despite initial fluctuations. This illustrates the critical role of feedback in maintaining stability in OP-AMP circuits.
goodphy
Messages
212
Reaction score
8
Hello.

I've studied the golden rules of the feedback OP-AMP and applying this to voltage follower shows that voltage gain (Vout/Vin) is 1.

Thus, Vout should eventually follows Vin when Vin suddenly changed. I've tried to follow this process for clear feeling by drawing pictures as shown in the attached image.

Since AV is very large for typical OP-AMP, It looks Vout becomes divergent! (or becomes saturation value.) This divergence is even more clear when feedback equation is approximates to (V+ - V-)AVn where n is number of looping. (You can get this approximation by looking last shown Vout in the image.)

What was I wrong? Why does feedback make the system crazy?
 

Attachments

  • OP-AMP feedback process in step by step.jpg
    OP-AMP feedback process in step by step.jpg
    20.7 KB · Views: 698
Engineering news on Phys.org
I am afraid, you are mixing open-loop gain Aol with closed-loop gain Acl=1.
Hence, the third figure in your sequence is wrong:
Here is the correct sequence assuming Acl=1(because of full negative feedback):
1.)Vin=3V, Vout=3V
2.) Sudden jump from Vin=3V to Vin=5V: In the very first moment we still have Vout=3V (time constant of the device),
3.) Hence Vdiff=5-3=+2V (this is the diff. voltage directly between the input nodes)
4.) Therefore, Vout tends to increase (direction to pos. supply) and passes a value of slightly below 5V, which causes Vdiff~some µV
5.) This is a new equilibrium because the tiny Vdiff (µV range) multiplied with the (large) open-loop gain "holds" the value of Vout at a value very close to 5V (perhaps 4.99995, depending on the open-loop gain Aol).
 
  • Like
Likes Dschumanji and goodphy
LvW said:
I am afraid, you are mixing open-loop gain Aol with closed-loop gain Acl=1.
Hence, the third figure in your sequence is wrong:
Here is the correct sequence assuming Acl=1(because of full negative feedback):
1.)Vin=3V, Vout=3V
2.) Sudden jump from Vin=3V to Vin=5V: In the very first moment we still have Vout=3V (time constant of the device),
3.) Hence Vdiff=5-3=+2V (this is the diff. voltage directly between the input nodes)
4.) Therefore, Vout tends to increase (direction to pos. supply) and passes a value of slightly below 5V, which causes Vdiff~some µV
5.) This is a new equilibrium because the tiny Vdiff (µV range) multiplied with the (large) open-loop gain "holds" the value of Vout at a value very close to 5V (perhaps 4.99995, depending on the open-loop gain Aol).
Thanks for replying! But I think I need a little more help for the detailed process.

Could you tell me more about details of 4th process in your reply that how Vout suddenly gets the value slightly below 5V at 1st forward feeding? I thought it should be 2Aol in volt since open loop gain Aol is intrinsic property of OP-AMP so Vout = VdiffAol always holds from inputs to output regardless of feedback loop.
 
goodphy said:
... open loop gain Aol is intrinsic property of OP-AMP so Vout = VdiffAol always holds from inputs to output regardless of feedback loop.
.
Yes - that`s correct. Let me try to explain in more detail.
....4.) Because Vdiff is heavily enlarged (by 2 V) the opamp "feels" that the input is overdriven and the output tends to go into positive saturation. However, it does not "jump" to the supply rail (because of internal time constants) but there will be a finite rise time.
And - as I have mentioned - on the way to the pos. supply voltage the output crosses a voltage which again (as bevor in the 3V case) exactly fulfills the condition mentioned by you: Vout = Vdiff*Aol . At this point (in this moment) the rising is stopped (equilibrium) because a further increase of the feedback signal would again decrease the diff voltage Vdiff.
Example: Vout=5.1 V. That means: Feedback voltage (at the inv. terminal) is also 5.1V and Vdiff=5-5.1=-0.1 V.
Hence, the opamp sees a negative diff. voltage and tends to go back to negative output voltages (and will stop again at an output which fulfills Vout=Vdiff*Aol).

There is only one stable condition (equilibrium) caused by negative feedback: In my example:
Vin=5V, Vout=+4.99995V, Vdiff=0.00005V.
From this, we can calculate back:
Aol=Vout/Vdiff=99999.
OK?
 
  • Like
Likes Sergei Gorbikov, Dschumanji and goodphy
Yes thanks!

So what my picture does not show is finite response time OP-AMP. My picture implicitly assumed that response time of OP-AMP is a brink of instance, which is impossible in real world! Thus as on the way of Vout increase triggered by sudden input voltage change, It finds equilibrium point where OP-AMP gain equation Vout = AOLVdiff holds and stay there. It looks like OP-AMP finds comfort "home" during journey at which it intended to go somewhere at first time.
 
Yes - that is the secret of stabilization caused by negative feedback. And this is only ONE benefit of negative feedback. There are some more.
 
  • Like
Likes Dschumanji and goodphy
Thread 'I thought it was only Amazon that sold unsafe junk'
I grabbed an under cabinet LED light today at a big box store. Nothing special. 18 inches in length and made to plug several lights together. Here is a pic of the power cord: The drawing on the box led me to believe that it would accept a standard IEC cord which surprised me. But it's a variation of it. I didn't try it, but I would assume you could plug a standard IEC cord into this and have a double male cord AKA suicide cord. And to boot, it's likely going to reverse the hot and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
9K