Question for stability of negative feedback OP-AMP

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the stability of negative feedback in operational amplifiers (OP-AMPs), particularly focusing on the behavior of a voltage follower configuration when subjected to sudden changes in input voltage. Participants explore the implications of open-loop and closed-loop gains, response times, and the conditions under which the output stabilizes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the OP-AMP's output should follow the input voltage closely due to the closed-loop gain being 1, but express confusion over the output diverging or saturating.
  • Others argue that the initial output does not immediately change with the input due to the time constant of the device, leading to a differential voltage that influences the output behavior.
  • A participant questions the assumption that the output voltage can be directly calculated as Vdiff multiplied by the open-loop gain, suggesting that feedback dynamics must be considered.
  • Another participant explains that the output tends to approach a new equilibrium point rather than jumping to the supply voltage, emphasizing the role of negative feedback in stabilizing the output.
  • There is a discussion about the finite response time of the OP-AMP, which affects how quickly the output can adjust to changes in input voltage.
  • Some participants highlight that negative feedback provides stabilization as the output seeks an equilibrium point during its response to input changes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the role of negative feedback in stabilizing the output of an OP-AMP, but there are differing views on the specifics of how the output responds to sudden changes in input voltage and the implications of open-loop versus closed-loop gain. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact dynamics of the output behavior during transient conditions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the instantaneous response of the OP-AMP and the dependence on the specific characteristics of the device, such as its time constants and gain values. The discussion does not resolve the complexities involved in the feedback loop dynamics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners interested in understanding the behavior of operational amplifiers, particularly in feedback configurations, and those exploring the implications of feedback on system stability.

goodphy
Messages
212
Reaction score
8
Hello.

I've studied the golden rules of the feedback OP-AMP and applying this to voltage follower shows that voltage gain (Vout/Vin) is 1.

Thus, Vout should eventually follows Vin when Vin suddenly changed. I've tried to follow this process for clear feeling by drawing pictures as shown in the attached image.

Since AV is very large for typical OP-AMP, It looks Vout becomes divergent! (or becomes saturation value.) This divergence is even more clear when feedback equation is approximates to (V+ - V-)AVn where n is number of looping. (You can get this approximation by looking last shown Vout in the image.)

What was I wrong? Why does feedback make the system crazy?
 

Attachments

  • OP-AMP feedback process in step by step.jpg
    OP-AMP feedback process in step by step.jpg
    20.7 KB · Views: 714
Engineering news on Phys.org
I am afraid, you are mixing open-loop gain Aol with closed-loop gain Acl=1.
Hence, the third figure in your sequence is wrong:
Here is the correct sequence assuming Acl=1(because of full negative feedback):
1.)Vin=3V, Vout=3V
2.) Sudden jump from Vin=3V to Vin=5V: In the very first moment we still have Vout=3V (time constant of the device),
3.) Hence Vdiff=5-3=+2V (this is the diff. voltage directly between the input nodes)
4.) Therefore, Vout tends to increase (direction to pos. supply) and passes a value of slightly below 5V, which causes Vdiff~some µV
5.) This is a new equilibrium because the tiny Vdiff (µV range) multiplied with the (large) open-loop gain "holds" the value of Vout at a value very close to 5V (perhaps 4.99995, depending on the open-loop gain Aol).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dschumanji and goodphy
LvW said:
I am afraid, you are mixing open-loop gain Aol with closed-loop gain Acl=1.
Hence, the third figure in your sequence is wrong:
Here is the correct sequence assuming Acl=1(because of full negative feedback):
1.)Vin=3V, Vout=3V
2.) Sudden jump from Vin=3V to Vin=5V: In the very first moment we still have Vout=3V (time constant of the device),
3.) Hence Vdiff=5-3=+2V (this is the diff. voltage directly between the input nodes)
4.) Therefore, Vout tends to increase (direction to pos. supply) and passes a value of slightly below 5V, which causes Vdiff~some µV
5.) This is a new equilibrium because the tiny Vdiff (µV range) multiplied with the (large) open-loop gain "holds" the value of Vout at a value very close to 5V (perhaps 4.99995, depending on the open-loop gain Aol).
Thanks for replying! But I think I need a little more help for the detailed process.

Could you tell me more about details of 4th process in your reply that how Vout suddenly gets the value slightly below 5V at 1st forward feeding? I thought it should be 2Aol in volt since open loop gain Aol is intrinsic property of OP-AMP so Vout = VdiffAol always holds from inputs to output regardless of feedback loop.
 
goodphy said:
... open loop gain Aol is intrinsic property of OP-AMP so Vout = VdiffAol always holds from inputs to output regardless of feedback loop.
.
Yes - that`s correct. Let me try to explain in more detail.
....4.) Because Vdiff is heavily enlarged (by 2 V) the opamp "feels" that the input is overdriven and the output tends to go into positive saturation. However, it does not "jump" to the supply rail (because of internal time constants) but there will be a finite rise time.
And - as I have mentioned - on the way to the pos. supply voltage the output crosses a voltage which again (as bevor in the 3V case) exactly fulfills the condition mentioned by you: Vout = Vdiff*Aol . At this point (in this moment) the rising is stopped (equilibrium) because a further increase of the feedback signal would again decrease the diff voltage Vdiff.
Example: Vout=5.1 V. That means: Feedback voltage (at the inv. terminal) is also 5.1V and Vdiff=5-5.1=-0.1 V.
Hence, the opamp sees a negative diff. voltage and tends to go back to negative output voltages (and will stop again at an output which fulfills Vout=Vdiff*Aol).

There is only one stable condition (equilibrium) caused by negative feedback: In my example:
Vin=5V, Vout=+4.99995V, Vdiff=0.00005V.
From this, we can calculate back:
Aol=Vout/Vdiff=99999.
OK?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sergei Gorbikov, Dschumanji and goodphy
Yes thanks!

So what my picture does not show is finite response time OP-AMP. My picture implicitly assumed that response time of OP-AMP is a brink of instance, which is impossible in real world! Thus as on the way of Vout increase triggered by sudden input voltage change, It finds equilibrium point where OP-AMP gain equation Vout = AOLVdiff holds and stay there. It looks like OP-AMP finds comfort "home" during journey at which it intended to go somewhere at first time.
 
Yes - that is the secret of stabilization caused by negative feedback. And this is only ONE benefit of negative feedback. There are some more.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dschumanji and goodphy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
9K