Question involving annihilators and solution spaces

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter britatuni
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around proving that the solution space of the intersection of a subspace U and a dual space W is a subspace of the solution space of the sum of W and the annihilator of U. The solution space of W is defined as the set of elements in vector space V that satisfy f(v) = 0 for all functions f in the dual space of W. The annihilator of U consists of functions in V* that yield zero when applied to elements of U. The proof requires demonstrating that elements in the intersection satisfy the conditions for the combined solution space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and dual spaces
  • Familiarity with the concepts of solution spaces and annihilators
  • Knowledge of linear algebra, specifically the properties of subspaces
  • Ability to work with functionals in dual spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of dual spaces in linear algebra
  • Learn about the concept of annihilators in vector spaces
  • Explore the relationship between solution spaces and their intersections
  • Investigate the proof techniques used in linear algebra for subspace relationships
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on linear algebra, vector spaces, and functional analysis. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of solution spaces and annihilators in the context of dual spaces.

britatuni
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was hoping to get help on a question that has been bugging me, I goes like this:

V is a vector space with a dual space V* and U is a subspace of V and W a subspace of V*

The question ask to show that:
'the solution space of W intersected with U' is a subspace of 'the solution space of (W + the annihilator of U)'.


Now, looking at the left hand side I see that an element, 'x', within U must be satisfy f(x)=0 for all functions, 'f', within W.
I realize that the above is barely a start on the question at all. But after looking at eh definitions I just don't see where I am expected to go next.

Please Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello britatuni! I'm not familiar with your definitions of solution space and annihilator. Can you write them for me? English is not my native language and I think I know what is being asked, but I cannot be sure until the terms are defined. :D

Cheers!
 
Hi, sorry for the late response since I was on holiday without internet.

I have the solution space of W defined as the set of elements (v) in V that satisfy the condition that f(v) = 0 for every function f in the dual space of W.
And the annihilator is defined as the set of functions (g) in V*such that g(u) = 0 for every element u in the subspace U.
 
britatuni said:
I was hoping to get help on a question that has been bugging me, I goes like this:

V is a vector space with a dual space V* and U is a subspace of V and W a subspace of V*

The question ask to show that:
'the solution space of W intersected with U' is a subspace of 'the solution space of (W + the annihilator of U)'.


Now, looking at the left hand side I see that an element, 'x', within U must be satisfy f(x)=0 for all functions, 'f', within W.
I realize that the above is barely a start on the question at all. But after looking at eh definitions I just don't see where I am expected to go next.
So it appears that "the solution space of $W\,$" is what I would call the pre-annihilator of $W$, namely the space $W_{\perp} \stackrel {\text{def}}{=} \{x\in X : f(x) = 0\ \forall f\in W\}$. You are asked to show that $W_{\perp} \cap U \subseteq \bigl(W + U^{\perp}\bigr)_{\perp}$ (where $U^{\perp}\stackrel {\text{def}}{=} \{f\in W : f(u)=0\ \forall u\in U\}$ is the annihilator of $U$).

Let $x\in W_{\perp} \cap U$. You correctly say that this implies $f(x) = 0$ for all $f$ in $W$. You are asked to show that $f(x) = 0$ for all $f$ in $W + U^{\perp}$. An element of $W + U^{\perp}$ is by definition the sum of an element in $W$ and an element in $U^{\perp}$. Show that both those elements of $V^*$ must vanish at $x$, and you have completed the proof.

[I think that this problem belongs to linear algebra rather than analysis, so I have transferred it to the Linear and Abstract Algebra section.]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K