How this defines a linear transformation

[Granger]

Admit that V is a linear space about \mathbb{R} and that U and W are subspaces of V. Suppose that S: U \rightarrow Y and T: W \rightarrow Y are two linear transformations that satisfy the property:

(\forall x \in U \cap W) S(x)=T(x)

Define a linear transformation F: U+W \rightarrow Y that matches with S for values in U and matches with T with values in W.

My thought is to choose the linear transformation F=S+T because it will be the union of both transformation, right? But we have the problem that when our objects are in the intersection of both space we will get to F = 2S instead of S

 

[Stephen Tashi]

On this forum the tags using backslash and "tex" don't work for LaTex. Use a forward slash.

Admit that $V$ is a linear space about $\mathbb{R}$ and that U and W are subspaces of V. Suppose that $S: U \rightarrow Y$ and $T: W \rightarrow Y$ are two linear transformations that satisfy the property:
$(\forall x \in U \cap W)\ S(x)=T(x)$
Define a linear transformation $F$: $U+W \rightarrow Y$ that matches with S for values in U and matches with T with values in W.

Are you asking whether it is possible to define such a linear transformaton ?

My thought is to choose the linear transformation $F=S+T$ because it will be the union of both transformation, right? But we have the problem that when our objects are in the intersection of both space we will get to F = 2S instead of S

 

[Granger]

Hello Stephen!

Thanks, I edited my question.

No, I know it's possible to define the linear transformation I'm asking what should be the linear transformation and how can I get there :)

 

[jbunniii]

Do you know about direct sums, and complements of subspaces?