Question on Lorentz space-time transformations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Lorentz space-time transformations in the context of special relativity. The original poster presents a problem involving two events occurring at the same location in one inertial frame but separated by different time intervals in another frame. The questions focus on calculating the distance between the events in the second frame and the relative speed of the frames.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to rearrange the Lorentz transformations to solve for the distance and speed but encounters difficulties with the Lorentz factor. Some participants suggest using matrix representations to clarify the transformations, while others discuss the implications of Lorentz invariance in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering different perspectives on how to approach the calculations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of Lorentz invariance and matrix multiplication, but there remains a lack of consensus on the most straightforward method to derive the necessary values.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific units being used (c=1) and the need for clarity on matrix operations, indicating potential gaps in understanding among participants. The original poster expresses a desire to learn the "proper" method, suggesting a focus on foundational understanding rather than just obtaining answers.

Oscur
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hey, not strictly homework but this is probably the best place for it, I wonder if you guys can help me out with a past paper question I've been pondering:

Two events occur at the same place in an inertial reference frame S, but are
separated in time by 3 seconds. In a different inertial frame S' they are separated in
time by 4 seconds.
(a) What is the distance between the two events·as measured in S'? [4]
(b) What is the speed of S relative to S'? [4]


Now, I've tried rearranging the Lorentz transformations for the reference frame velocity in order to equate them, and sub in the numbers given above, but I still have trouble because the Lorentz factor (gamma) sticks around. It wouldn't be too hard to do the second part of the question first, and get the distance from that, but I'd like to know the "proper" method.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can take the coordinates of the two events in frame S to be x=(0,0) and y=(3,0). A Lorentz transformation takes the origin to itself, so x'=(0,0), and according to your specifications we must have y'=(4,d), with d to be determined, and this is how you determine it:

[tex]\begin{pmatrix}4\\ d\end{pmatrix}=\gamma\begin{pmatrix}1 & v\\ v & 1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}3\\ 0\end{pmatrix}[/tex]

The same equation gives you v, which is the velocity of S in S'. Note that I'm using units such that c=1.
 
Hmm, thanks for your response, using column vectors with time as an extra co-ordinate was something I hadn't considered.

The equation you quote appears to be similar to a set that I have derived, which is encouraging, I think I'm on the right track. I'm still not sure how to obtain d from the bottom row though.
 
That part is extremely easy. Do you know how to multiply matrices? Do you see what the bottom row is?

Edit: I meant that it's extremely easy if you have already obtained [itex]\gamma[/itex] from the first row and calculated v from it. That part is slightly harder, but only slightly.

If you're suprised by the fact that I used "column vectors with time as an extra coordinate", I have to ask if you really know what a Lorentz transformation is. What else would a Lorentz transformation act on?
 
Last edited:
Oscur said:
... same place in ... S, ...separated in time by 3 seconds. In ... S' ... separated in time by 4 seconds.
(a) What is the distance between the two events·as measured in S'? [4]
(b) What is the speed of S relative to S'? [4][/b]
... I'd like to know the "proper" method.
I wonder if you are making a pun. Anyway, the proper way to do it is the "proper" way to do it. You should know that

[tex]\Delta{}t^2-\Delta{}x^2=\Delta{}t'^2-\Delta{}x'^2[/tex]

is a Lorentz invariant. So, you can use the information in [itex]S[/itex] to calculate it, and then use this value in [itex]S'[/itex] to calculate [itex]\Delta{}x'[/itex] for part (a). Then, for part (b) simply use

[tex]v'=\frac{\Delta{}x'}{\Delta{}t'}[/tex]
 
@Frederik: I didn't say it surprised me, I just said it was a method of representing the problem I hadn't considered. Now that I re-read what you've said there, I understand perfectly how to solve it, I was simply misreading your equation, my bad.

@Turin: No, no pun intended, but well spotted!#

Thanks for the help, both of you. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K