What does Poynting Theorem reveal about electrodynamic losses?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Poynting Theorem reveals that electrodynamic losses are primarily due to conductive losses, represented by the equation \(\vec E \cdot \vec J = \sigma E^2\), which indicates ohmic resistance. The theorem also integrates the energy density of the electromagnetic field, \(\mathcal{E}=\frac{1}{2} (\vec{E} \cdot \vec{D}+\vec{B} \cdot \vec{H})\), and the Poynting vector, \(\vec{S}=\vec{E} \times \vec{H}\), to illustrate how energy is lost through work done on charges and radiation of electromagnetic waves. The total energy in the electromagnetic fields decreases over time due to these processes, confirming that the Poynting Theorem functions as a work-energy conservation theorem in electrodynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Poynting Theorem and its mathematical formulation
  • Familiarity with Noether's theorem and energy density concepts
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic field theory, including electric (\(\vec{E}\)) and magnetic (\(\vec{B}\)) fields
  • Basic principles of conductive losses and ohmic resistance in electrical circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Noether's theorem in electromagnetic theory
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Poynting vector in different contexts
  • Investigate the relationship between electromagnetic fields and energy conservation
  • Learn about the effects of polarization and magnetization on energy density in materials
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students of electromagnetism seeking to deepen their understanding of energy losses in electrodynamics and the applications of Poynting Theorem in practical scenarios.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
Poynting Theorem stated:

\vec E \cdot \vec J = - \frac 1 2 \frac {\partial} {\partial t} ( \epsilon E^2 + \frac 1 {\mu} B^2) - \frac 1 {\mu} \nabla \cdot( \vec E \times \vec B)

In pure electrodynamic point of view,

\vec E \cdot \vec J = \sigma E^2 which is nothing more than conductive loss ( resistance ohmic loss).

But I have a suspicion that is more to it than this...nothing is that simple. Please tell me what I missed.

Thanks

Alan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's precisely what it is! Perhaps it's easiest to grasp by bringig the first term of the right-hand side of your equation to the left and the EJ term to the right and integrate the whole expression over a finite volume.

From Noether's theorem you know that

\mathcal{E}=\frac{1}{2} (\vec{E} \cdot \vec{D}+\vec{B} \cdot \vec{H})

is the energy density of the electromagnetic field (including polarization and magnetization effects of the bound charges/magnetic dipoles in the medium).

The Poynting vector,

\vec{S}=\vec{E} \times \vec{H}

is the energy flux. So manipulating your equation in the way indicated above, you get

\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} E_{\text{field}}=-\int_{V} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \vec{J} \cdot \vec{E} - \int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot \vec{S}.

For the term with the Poynting vector, I've used Gauß's integral law. This equation means that the total field energy gets lost by the work done, i.e., to the motion of the charges, upon which the em. field acts and by radiation of em. waves, which transports energy through the surface of the volume under consideration.
 
Thanks, that make me feel a lot better.
 
Yes, the Poynting Theorem is really the electrodynamic work-energy conservation theorem. If the total energy contained in the electromagnetic fields decreases over time it must be because the fields did work on charges and created currents, or because the energy simply flowed out of the volume of interest.

Technically, the Poynting vector just describes energy crossing a surface, which can happen even if we don't have traditional radiated waves.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
566
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
654
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
632