How Does Poynting's Theorem Explain Ohmic Loss?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
Poynting Theorem:

[tex]\frac {dW}{dt} \;=\; \int _{v'} (\vec E \cdot \vec J) d \vec {v'} \;=\; -\frac 1 2 \frac {\partial}{\partial t} \int _{v'} ( \epsilon_0 E^2 +\frac 1 {\mu_0} B^2) d \vec {v'}\;-\;\frac 1 {\mu_0} \int _{s'} (\vec E X \vec B) d \vec {s'}[/tex]

In Cheng's "Field and Wave Electromagnetics", it interpret this is ohmic loss because:

[tex]\vec E \cdot \vec J \;=\; \sigma E^2[/tex]

Which is the ohmic loss.

I don't see it described like this in Griffiths. Can anyone comment what this term really means?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your question, is it how to interpret the J.E-term (. denotes scalar product), or how you find out that the J.E-term is the Ohmic loss?