How Does Poynting's Theorem Explain Ohmic Loss?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
Poynting Theorem:

[tex]\frac {dW}{dt} \;=\; \int _{v'} (\vec E \cdot \vec J) d \vec {v'} \;=\; -\frac 1 2 \frac {\partial}{\partial t} \int _{v'} ( \epsilon_0 E^2 +\frac 1 {\mu_0} B^2) d \vec {v'}\;-\;\frac 1 {\mu_0} \int _{s'} (\vec E X \vec B) d \vec {s'}[/tex]

In Cheng's "Field and Wave Electromagnetics", it interpret this is ohmic loss because:

[tex]\vec E \cdot \vec J \;=\; \sigma E^2[/tex]

Which is the ohmic loss.

I don't see it described like this in Griffiths. Can anyone comment what this term really means?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
What is your question, is it how to interpret the J.E-term (. denotes scalar product), or how you find out that the J.E-term is the Ohmic loss?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K