Question on the new gravity wave discovery

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the recent discovery of gravitational waves, exploring the nature of gravity, energy expenditure related to mass, and the relationship between mass and gravitational wave production. Participants raise questions and hypotheses about the mechanics of gravity and gravitational waves, both pre- and post-discovery.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the distortion of space/time by a mass like Earth requires an expenditure of energy and seeks to understand the source of that energy.
  • Another participant responds that energy is radiated away as gravitational waves, with the energy coming from the decay of the orbit, although the effect is negligible for Earth.
  • There is a discussion about whether the mass of a body is converted into energy to create gravitational waves, with one participant stating that in the case of a black hole merger, a significant amount of mass was converted into energy and radiated as gravitational waves.
  • Participants explore the relationship between the intensity of gravitational effects and the production of gravitational waves, suggesting that more massive bodies or closer orbits produce stronger waves.
  • One participant inquires whether any established theories were disproven by the discovery of gravitational waves, questioning if there were claims against the existence of gravitational waves prior to this discovery.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the relationship between mass, energy, and gravitational wave production, but there are unresolved questions about the implications of these relationships and the historical context of gravitational wave theories.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about energy expenditure and the mechanics of gravitational waves remain unaddressed, and the discussion includes varying levels of understanding regarding the implications of the discovery.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying gravitational physics, astrophysics, or the implications of recent discoveries in gravitational wave astronomy.

thetexan
Messages
271
Reaction score
13
Up until today I understood, in my own feeble way, that masses distorted space/time and explained how gravity worked. So I have one pre-discovery question to see if I understood that before we move on to the new discovery...

Pre-discovery question: If a mass like our Earth distorts space/time wouldn't the distortion require an expenditure of energy on the part of the mass? And if so where does that energy supplied from?

Post discovery question: This is sort of related. Gravity waves must get their energy from a mass. Even the example of two massive bodies used by CalTech suggested that the body gets smaller over time through the loss of this gravity wave generating energy. So is the mass of the body converted into the energy used to create the gravity waves? How does this work? This is like question one.

tex
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
thetexan said:
Up until today I understood, in my own feeble way, that masses distorted space/time and explained how gravity worked. So I have one pre-discovery question to see if I understood that before we move on to the new discovery...

Pre-discovery question: If a mass like our Earth distorts space/time wouldn't the distortion require an expenditure of energy on the part of the mass? And if so where does that energy supplied from?
Yes, energy is radiated away as gravitational waves. The energy comes from decay of the orbit. As the Earth radiates gravitational waves, it moves slightly closer to the sun. Gravitational potential energy is released, which is converted into energy of gravitational waves. In the case of the Earth, the gravitational waves are so weak that the change of the orbit is immeasurably small, but in the case of massive bodies which are close together, like black holes, the energy release can be large.

Post discovery question: This is sort of related. Gravity waves must get their energy from a mass. Even the example of two massive bodies used by CalTech suggested that the body gets smaller over time through the loss of this gravity wave generating energy. So is the mass of the body converted into the energy used to create the gravity waves? How does this work? This is like question one.

Yes. In the case of the BH merger reported on today, approximately 3 solar masses were converted to energy and radiated away as gravitational waves which were detected by LIGO. The statement was made that at the peak (for a few milliseconds), the power emitted in gravitational waves exceeded to power emitted in light by all of the stars in the observable universe.
 
So the more intense the gravity effect on space/time the more gravity waves produced? For example, two massive bodies orbiting each other has a great distortion as opposed to a free floating body where the gravitational pull from some other body thousands of light years away is very small...therefore little distortion and waves?

Is that about it?
 
thetexan said:
So the more intense the gravity effect on space/time the more gravity waves produced? For example, two massive bodies orbiting each other has a great distortion as opposed to a free floating body where the gravitational pull from some other body thousands of light years away is very small...therefore little distortion and waves?
Is that about it?
That's about it. Two bodies of mass m orbiting at a distance r will emit gravitational wave energy at a rate proportional to m^3/r^5. So it goes up very fast as they get closer together.
 
Were there any respectable theories proven wrong by this discovery? Did some astronomers claim gravity waves were not real?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K