Question regarding Blundell: Concepts in Thermal Physics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Helmholtz function in the context of a system comprising positrons and electrons, as outlined in Blundell's "Concepts in Thermal Physics." The total Helmholtz function is expressed as ##F = F_+ (T,V,N_+) + F_- (T,V,N_-)##, leading to a critical examination of the transition from equation (22.57) to (22.58). The participants clarify that the chemical potentials for positrons and electrons are derived from their respective Helmholtz functions, as indicated in equations (22.59) and (22.60). The method of undetermined multipliers is suggested for resolving the constraints imposed by charge conservation on the Helmholtz function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Helmholtz free energy in thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with chemical potential concepts
  • Knowledge of statistical thermodynamics
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Helmholtz functions in multi-species systems
  • Explore the method of undetermined multipliers in thermodynamic contexts
  • Investigate the implications of charge conservation on thermodynamic functions
  • Review statistical mechanics principles related to particle interactions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for graduate students in physics, researchers in thermodynamics, and anyone studying the statistical mechanics of particle systems, particularly those interested in the behavior of electron-positron pairs.

WWCY
Messages
476
Reaction score
15
Hi all, I have an issue with understanding the following passage in the aforementioned book. I have uploaded the relevant passage as an image below. Any assistance is greatly appreciated!

The paragraph under equation (22.57) says that the total Helmholtz function ##F## is a sum of Helmholtz functions of both positrons and electrons. This means ##F = F_+ (T,V,N_+) + F_- (T,V,N_-) ##, which I guess means
$$\frac{\partial F_- (T,V,N_+ - N)}{\partial N_-}|_{T,V,N} + \frac{\partial F_+ (T,V,N + N_-)}{\partial N_+}|_{T,V,N} = 0$$
Question 1: How then, do I go from this expression to (22.58), where the first term is a partial derivative of ##F##, and instead of ##N## being kept constant, we keep ##N_+## constant, and where the second term is a partial derivative over ##F## as well?

Question 2: The book then goes on to define the chemical potential for positrons and electrons in (22.59) and (22.60). Why are they not defined in terms of their respective Helmholtz functions instead of the total Helmholtz function? So for example:
$$\frac{\partial F_- (T,V,N_-)}{\partial N_-}|_{T,V} = \mu _-$$
Since the general definition for chemical potential under constant ##T## and ##V## is
$$\frac{\partial F (T,V,N)}{\partial N} |_{T,V} = \mu $$

Edit: Upon more careful reading, I have found out that the answer to question 2 lies in the fact that ##dF =-pdV - SdT + \sum_i \mu _i dN_i## for the multi-species case, which I forgot about. I still can't see how to resolve question 1 though.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Regarding such problems, one can also use the method of undetermined multipliers.

Write for the Helmholtz Function of the electron-positron “gas”:

##F=F(T,V;N_-,N_+)##

The constraint due to charge conservation:

##N_0=N_--N_+=const.##

Define formally a "new" function ##\tilde{F}## where ##λ## is the undetermined multiplier:

##\tilde{F}=F(T,V;N_-,N_+)+λ(N_0-(N_--N_+))##

Search for the minimum of ##\tilde{F}## with respect to variations in ##N_-## and ##N_+##:

##\frac{\partial \tilde{F}}{\partial N_-}|_{N_+}=0## ⇒ ##\frac{\partial F(T,V; N_-,N_+)}{\partial N_-}|_{T,V,N_+}-λ=\mu _--λ=0##

##\frac{\partial \tilde{F}}{\partial N_+}|_{N_-}=0## ⇒ ##\frac{\partial F(T,V; N_-,N_+)}{\partial N_+}|_{T,V,N_-}+λ=\mu_++λ=0##

Eliminating ##λ## gives:

##\mu_-+\mu_+=0##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWCY

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K