Question Regarding Determining the Mass of Venus

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter astropi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Venus
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the determination of Venus's mass using the standard gravitational parameter (μ) as outlined in the paper "Venus Gravity: 180th Degree and Order Model" by A. S. Konopliv, W. B. Banerdt, and W. L. Sjogren. The reported value for GM is 324858.63 ± 0.01, but the user encountered discrepancies in their calculations, initially suspecting unit confusion. It was clarified that the standard gravitational parameter is typically expressed in SI units of m3s−2, while km3s−2 is also commonly used, accounting for the significant difference in orders of magnitude. This highlights the importance of unit conversion in celestial mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of celestial mechanics and gravitational parameters
  • Familiarity with the concepts of gravitational constant (G) and mass (M)
  • Knowledge of unit conversions between SI and non-SI units
  • Basic comprehension of scientific literature and its conventions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the standard gravitational parameter (μ) and its applications in celestial mechanics
  • Study unit conversions between SI and non-SI units in scientific contexts
  • Examine the methodologies used in the paper "Venus Gravity: 180th Degree and Order Model"
  • Explore the implications of accurate mass determination for spacecraft navigation
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of celestial mechanics seeking to deepen their understanding of gravitational parameters and their applications in planetary science.

astropi
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Trying to determine the "strange" units this paper is using.
Venus is in the news! I looked up this well-regarded paper by A. S. Konopliv, W. B. Banerdt, and W. L. Sjogren
Venus Gravity: 180th Degree and Order Model
They list values for GM (see attached picture), such as
GM 324858.63 ± 0.01
so in principle calculating M should be trivial. The problem is I am orders of magnitude off from the actual value. I thought perhaps they were using cgs units, but that gives a value for M that is 15 orders of magnitude off. Clearly, I'm missing something. I looked through the paper and couldn't find anything that clarified the situation. Anyone know the units they are using or what I am missing? Thanks in advance.

Edit: Just to clarify, this is NOT for homework or any school related activity. Simply my own understanding.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2020-09-18 05-51-56.png
    Screenshot from 2020-09-18 05-51-56.png
    11.5 KB · Views: 213
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Wikipedia said:
In celestial mechanics, the standard gravitational parameter μ of a celestial body is the product of the gravitational constant G and the mass M of the body.
\mu =GM\

For several objects in the Solar System, the value of μ is known to greater accuracy than either G or M.The SI units of the standard gravitational parameter are ##m^3 s^{−2}##. However, units of ##km^3 s^{−2}## are frequently used in the scientific literature and in spacecraft navigation.
That's your 9 orders of magnitude difference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stefan r and astropi
Thanks Bandersnatch, in retrospect that should have been pretty obvious!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K