Question Regarding Harmonic Oscillator Eigenkets

Thunder_Jet
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!

Given that a harmonic oscillator has eigenkstates |n> where n = 1,2,3,..., how can we calculate <X>, <P>, <X^2>, etc. Is there a need to define a wavefunction in the |n> basis?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Essentially no, because |n>'s are eigenkets of the number operator/Hamiltonian and X and P, though unbounded & with purely continuous spectrum, can be expressed as linear combinations of the raising & lowering ladder operators whose action on the eigenket's space becomes known once you establish that |n>'s are eigenkets of H and N.
 
So that means just express the |n> kets as linear combinations of the ladder operators, and then use them as ψ in the formula <X> = <ψ|X|ψ>? But how would you deal with the infinite dimensionality? Will the answer be finite in that case?

Thank you by the way for the idea!
 
Consider that
<br /> \hat{a}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\hat{x}+i\hat{p})<br />
and
<br /> \hat{a}^{\dagger}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\hat{x}-i\hat{p})<br />
You can use these to write \hat{x} and \hat{p} in terms of \hat{a} and \hat{a}^{\dagger}. Then you know
<br /> \hat{a}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle<br />
and
<br /> \hat{a}^{\dagger}|n\rangle=\sqrt{n+1}|n+1\rangle<br />
You have the tools to take the expectation value.
 
Thunder_Jet said:
So that means just express the |n> kets as linear combinations of the ladder operators, and then use them as ψ in the formula <X> = <ψ|X|ψ>? But how would you deal with the infinite dimensionality? Will the answer be finite in that case?

Thank you by the way for the idea!

You don't express the kets as ladder operators acting on the vacuum, you express x and p as ladder operators.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
429
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top