Question: What is the Effect of Mass on SHM Acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peter G.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Shm
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 2K views
Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question:

What happens when: We add increase the mass on a spring, displace it as much as we did with a lighter mass and allow it to oscillate. Would the period remain the same? In the end, the force was increased when displacing and the maximum displacement was kept constant.

Thanks
 
on Phys.org
Doc Al: The mass and the spring constant determine the period?
Vela: Hooke's Law describes the force exerted by a spring (product of the spring constant and extension until the elastic limit)

I was also thinking... (This is also probably wrong but you guys can maybe help me get over it) If the mass increases for the same force therefore the acceleration must decrease.

According to a = -w2x

The period must increase or the displacement decrease and the period remains constant. That is, the amplitude would be decreased so a full cycle would cover a smaller length...
 
Peter G. said:
Doc Al: The mass and the spring constant determine the period?
Right. Note that period does not depend on displacement.
Vela: Hooke's Law describes the force exerted by a spring (product of the spring constant and extension until the elastic limit)
Right. Note that force depends on spring constant and displacement, not on the mass.

I was also thinking... (This is also probably wrong but you guys can maybe help me get over it) If the mass increases for the same force therefore the acceleration must decrease.
Makes sense to me.

According to a = -w2x
That's good.

The period must increase or the displacement decrease and the period remains constant. That is, the amplitude would be decreased so a full cycle would cover a smaller length...
Since you gave the mass the same initial displacement, the amplitude is the same. But, since you changed the mass, the period changes. Since, as you point out, the acceleration is less at each point, it takes longer for the mass to go through its cycle: The period increases.
 
Doc Al said:
Since you gave the mass the same initial displacement, the amplitude is the same. But, since you changed the mass, the period changes. Since, as you point out, the acceleration is less at each point, it takes longer for the mass to go through its cycle: The period increases.

Ok, cool. Just one last thing. Using the same example if we reduce the initial displacement is it possible that we keep the period the same?
 
Peter G. said:
Just one last thing. Using the same example if we reduce the initial displacement is it possible that we keep the period the same?
You tell me. Does the period depend on the initial displacement?