Questions about Astronomy/Astrophysics

  • Context: Physics 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RESmonkey
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the experiences and career prospects in astronomy and astrophysics, particularly from the perspective of a student considering a shift from electrical/computer engineering. Topics include the demands of graduate education, work-life balance, social aspects, job market conditions, and potential career paths.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that pursuing a PhD in astrophysics typically takes 4-5 years, while another suggests it may take closer to six years due to varying demand for graduate students.
  • Concerns are raised about the demanding nature of graduate school and the post-doctoral phase, with one participant mentioning that postdoc durations may approach six years as well.
  • Another participant describes the work schedule of astrophysicists as not being a typical 9-5 job, with theorists having more flexibility compared to observational astronomers who must work around telescope availability.
  • Social life is discussed, with one participant indicating that it can be challenging to communicate work-related topics to those outside the field.
  • Salary expectations are mentioned, with one participant estimating starting salaries for tenure-track positions around $50k/year, while noting that graduate students and post-docs earn significantly less.
  • Job market competitiveness is highlighted, particularly in academia, where transitioning from post-doc to post-doc can complicate personal stability.
  • Another participant inquires about potential career paths for electrical/computer engineering graduates in space-related fields, such as working on space telescope optics or computer systems, questioning whether a PhD is necessary for such roles.
  • One participant suggests that work experience may be more valuable than a PhD for certain positions at NASA, although they recommend checking specific job requirements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the duration of PhD programs and post-doctoral work, with no consensus on the average time required. There is also a lack of agreement on the necessity of a PhD for certain engineering roles in the space sector.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the competitive nature of the job market in academia and the potential for long periods of temporary positions before securing a permanent role, which may impact personal and family life.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering a career in astronomy or astrophysics, individuals with a background in electrical/computer engineering interested in space-related applications, and those exploring the academic job market in STEM fields.

RESmonkey
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I'm a freshmen in Electrical/Computer engineering, but I think I'd rather do something much more fundamental in science, and after a few months of narrowing down, I came upon astronomy and astrophysics.

I know that a Phd is basically required, so that's 4-5 years after undergrad.


1. How are the lives of such scientists? Free time?

2. Social aspect?

3. Set work schedule, or ..?

4. Do most work in universities?

5. Obvious question, but the internet has mixed answers: What is an average salary like?

6. Job market?


Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not an astrophysicist, but I know a few.

1. I'm not sure what exactly you mean here. They're not all that different from anyone else. Going through graduate school is a demanding experience and generally requires you to put in more time than for a full-time job. You then move into post-doctoral work and finally into academia. Most of the successful people in this field are very driven, and thus they spend "free time" also working on their research. But you're not locked in a basement somewhere. You do have spare time.

2. As far as social life goes, it's a little different than having a regular 9-5 job. It can be hard, for example, to talk about work outside of work (ie. with your spouse), simply because the average person won't understand what you do without you first delving into an extended explanation.

3. Doing research professionally is not a 9-5 job, in general. Theorists have a little more opportunity to set their own hours. But in astronomy for example, you have to book time on different telescopes and make use of it when you have it. So you can expect lots of late nights staring at the stars.

4. Most academic work is done in universities. You can always branch out into the industrial world, but then you're likely doing research to advance a particular product or service as opposed to advancing the field in general.

5. You won't make a lot of money in academia. During life as a graduate student, you're barely making enough to cover tuition, rent and groceries. Post-doctoral work pays a little more. Ballpark: $30-40k/year. But you're moving from contract to contract working for ~2 years at a time and usually without great benefits. By the time you enter tenure-track positions, the pay gets better. Starting ballpark ~$50k/year and then going up from there. In some institutions, full professors make the "six figure" salary, but I'm not sure that's the norm. You might want to check out:
http://www.aip.org/statistics/
for some solid numbers.

6. Strictly speaking academia, it can be very competative. As I mentioned, following the PhD, you jump from post-doc to post-doc, which are often in different cities. So laying down some roots can be difficult, and it can be demanding on a family. That being said, with a PhD in physics you can do quite well for yourself in the "real world" provided you know how to market your skills.
 
RESmonkey said:
I know that a Phd is basically required, so that's 4-5 years after undergrad.

I doubt it. How long it takes to get through grad school depends (in an indirect way) on how much demand there is for graduate students in that area of study. So some PhD's are 4-5 year processes, but the average for astro is probably nearer to six years. There are lots of 7 year limit astro PhD's that are somehow shot out the door right before they're removed from the program.

This is also true of postdocs. I remember reading a while back that posdoc times for astro phd's were approaching 6 years as well. That might be on the high range, but in my experience it is believable.

Sixteen years till the first "permanent" position. Yeowch. Your time weighted lifetime income will be less than many jobs that don't require any degree at all. On the other hand, the work may (or may not) be a lot more interesting. Make sure you actually love what people in that line of work do. It's not enough to merely enjoy the material.
 
Ouch...that's a ton of more time compared to getting a BS in ECE...or even an MS.

Is there a way an ECE major (BS hopefully) can work w/ something related to space?

Like, space telescope optics/lenses? Or the computer systems in things sent out into space?
Or do those usually demand a Ph.D. in ECE?
 
I don't remember seeing many job descriptions at NASA that required a PhD in EE or ECE, but then I didn't look at them that carefully. I'm going to say that a PhD there isn't as important as actual work experience, but you'll want to check that (along with everything else I type).
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K