Questions about dative covalent bond and complexes

  • Thread starter Thread starter chatelier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bond
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of dative covalent bonds and their impact on atomic charge, specifically in the context of transition metal complexes like [Cu(H2O)6]2+. It is established that while forming a dative covalent bond, an atom does not necessarily become +1 charged; rather, the charge can be distributed across the complex. The example of carbon monoxide (CO) illustrates that charge distribution can vary, complicating the understanding of charge localization in complexes. The participants express confusion regarding the behavior of charges in dative bonds and seek clarity on when charge spreads versus when it remains localized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dative covalent bonds
  • Familiarity with transition metal complexes
  • Basic knowledge of atomic charge and electron transfer
  • Concept of charge distribution in molecular structures
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of dative covalent bonding in coordination chemistry
  • Study the charge distribution in transition metal complexes
  • Learn about the electronic structure of carbon monoxide (CO) and its implications
  • Explore the role of ligands in determining charge localization in complexes
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and researchers interested in coordination chemistry and the behavior of transition metal complexes.

chatelier
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
does an atom necessarily becomes +1 charged after forming a dative covalent bond with another atom?

just like something I learned in organic chem:
C6H5-H2N:+ H+ ------> C6H5-H2N+→H
the positive charge of H+ is transferred to the N atom as N forms a dative covalent bond with it.

analogically, in a transition metal complex like [Cu(H2O)6]2+, will each H2O molecule becomes +1 charged after forming dative covalent bond with Cu2+ ?

but should that be the case, Cu will then become -4 charged as 6 H2O molecules have formed dative covalent bonds with it...

but that sounds strange ^ ^ @@@@@
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well the web says the +ve charge should spread over the whole of the complex, so that means in no way can i know the charge on a specific atom?

also, how can i know when the charge will spread over and when it won't? just like the example quoted from the website, the positive charge will just stay on the N atom in NH3BF3.

hey i really got confused with dative covalent bond now.
 
Astronuc said:
But look at the example of carbon monoxide, CO.

um...actually how can the example of CO help me understand the structure of [Cu(H2O)6]2+ ?
 
seems no one can help...~~
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
20K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
Replies
4
Views
12K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K