Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the job prospects associated with an engineering physics degree, particularly in relation to concentrations in mechanical and electrical engineering. Participants explore various industries, areas of specialization, and the perceived differences in mathematical intensity between physics and engineering courses.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that job opportunities may vary significantly based on geographic location and industry preferences.
- In electrical engineering, participants mention potential areas such as nanoelectronics, photonics, and power engineering.
- For mechanical engineering, participants propose areas like computational fluid dynamics (CFD) as a good fit for those with a physics background.
- There is a discussion about the mathematical intensity of upper-level physics classes compared to engineering courses, with some suggesting that physics may have more mathematical breadth.
- Concerns are raised about the recognition of an engineering physics degree by employers, with some participants arguing that traditional engineering degrees may be more advantageous for job applications.
- One participant shares their experience of pursuing a double degree in mechanical engineering and physics, suggesting that a nuclear engineering degree could be a strong alternative.
- Another participant expresses a preference for physics over engineering but acknowledges an interest in both fields, questioning how well physics integrates with electrical or mechanical engineering.
- Internship experience is highlighted as a significant factor that could enhance employability, even for those with an engineering physics degree.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of opinions regarding the value of an engineering physics degree compared to traditional engineering degrees. There is no consensus on which concentration offers better job opportunities, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best path for combining physics with engineering.
Contextual Notes
Participants note that the recognition of engineering physics degrees may vary by region and industry, and there are concerns about the lack of ABET accreditation for some engineering physics programs. The discussion also reflects differing perspectives on the importance of specific concentrations and the relevance of internship experience.