MHB Questions about sets and subsets

  • Thread starter Thread starter shle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets Subsets
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving set relationships involving subsets X and Y of a universal set U. Specifically, it addresses the implication that if X is a subset of Y, then the complement of Y is a subset of the complement of X. A suggested approach includes using a Venn diagram to visualize the relationship, although a textual explanation suffices. The explanation provided clarifies that any element not in Y is also not in X, thereby confirming the subset relationship for their complements. This proof emphasizes the logical connections between subsets and their complements in set theory.
shle
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, the question goes as follows:

Given two subsets X and Y of a universal set U, prove that: (refer to picture)

I'm having particular trouble on D and E, if anyone can clear this up or provide some clarification for me that would be appreciated! I know a venn diagram might not be possible here so just an explanation is ok

Thank you!​
 

Attachments

  • Section218.jpg
    Section218.jpg
    72.5 KB · Views: 78
Mathematics news on Phys.org
shle said:
Hi, the question goes as follows:

Given two subsets X and Y of a universal set U, prove that: (refer to picture)

I'm having particular trouble on D and E, if anyone can clear this up or provide some clarification for me that would be appreciated! I know a venn diagram might not be possible here so just an explanation is ok

Thank you!​

d) Show that \( X\subseteq Y\) implies \(\overline{Y} \subseteq \overline{X}\)

Other than the Venn diagram where the region representing \(X\) is inside that representin \(Y\) so that the coplement of \(Y\) is contained within the complement of \(X\) (You are strongly recomended to draw the diagram), Consider any \(z \not\in Y\), then it is in \(\overline{Y}\), but because \( X\subseteq Y\) it is also not in \(X\), so is in \(\overline{X}\), which proves the result.

CB
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K