Questions about the accelerating Hubble expansion

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of accelerating expansion in the universe, particularly in relation to Hubble's law and the introduction of dark energy. Participants explore the implications of Hubble's findings from 1929 and how they relate to modern understandings of cosmic expansion, including the conditions under which acceleration occurs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether Hubble's law described accelerating expansion, suggesting that it only indicates a proportional relationship between velocity and distance.
  • Others argue that the expansion rate depends on the mix of matter, radiation, and dark energy, and that dark energy is necessary to match observed expansion rates.
  • There is a claim that the Hubble constant can decrease over time in a universe dominated by a cosmological constant, which some participants challenge.
  • Participants discuss the mathematical implications of Hubble's law, including the role of the proportionality constant and its potential variability over time.
  • Some assert that even if the proportionality constant were constant, the expansion could still be accelerating, while others argue that this is not the case.
  • There is a distinction made between different cosmological models, such as pure de Sitter spacetime and scenarios involving matter and radiation, affecting the nature of expansion.
  • Participants highlight that Hubble's original observations were limited to relatively nearby galaxies, which may not provide a complete picture of cosmic expansion dynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether Hubble's law implies accelerating expansion. Multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of Hubble's findings and the role of dark energy in the universe's expansion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include assumptions about the constancy of the proportionality constant and the dependence of expansion dynamics on the mix of cosmic components, which remain unresolved.

  • #31
Kairos said:
If H will approaches a constant value given by the cosmological constant, there will still be a continuous acceleration ?(exponential).
If ##H## is asymptotically approaching a constant value, the expansion of the universe is asymptotically approaching exponential. At what point during that process the expansion becomes accelerating depends on the details, but it will become accelerating at some point, and once it does, it will stay accelerating.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #32
In a spatially flat universe the Hubble parameter is given by $$H^2=\frac{8\pi G(\rho_m+\rho_r)}{3}+\frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}$$
##\rho_m## and ##\rho_r## decrease with time and ##\Lambda## stays constant, so the Hubble parameter decreases with time. In the remote future ##\rho_m## and ##\rho_r## will tend to zero and the Hubble parameter will become a constant given by $$H=\sqrt{\frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kairos
  • #33
DAH said:
In a spatially flat universe the Hubble parameter is given by $$H^2=\frac{8\pi G(\rho_m+\rho_r)}{3}+\frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}$$
##\rho_m## and ##\rho_r## decrease with time and ##\Lambda## stays constant, so the Hubble parameter decreases with time. In the remote future ##\rho_m## and ##\rho_r## will tend to zero and the Hubble parameter will become a constant given by $$H=\sqrt{\frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}}$$
Thank you. I understand that the densities decrease and lambda is left alone at the end. What I don't understand is why rho and lambda affect H in the same direction. I would have thought - and + signs since lambda increases expansion while rho slows it down.
 
  • #34
Kairos said:
What I don't understand is why rho and lambda affect H in the same direction. I would have thought - and + signs since lambda increases expansion while rho slows it down.
First, what you mean by "expansion" here is not ##H##, its ##\dot{a}##. They're not the same.

Second, when you say "lambda increases expansion while rho slows it down", what you mean is that dark energy, by itself, causes expansion to accelerate, while rho, by itself, causes expansion to decelerate. But the equation for ##H^2##, by itself, tells you nothing about acceleration or deceleration. What you need to look at is the equation for ##\ddot{a}##.
 
  • #35
PeterDonis said:
First, what you mean by "expansion" here is not ##H##, its ##\dot{a}##. They're not the same.

Second, when you say "lambda increases expansion while rho slows it down", what you mean is that dark energy, by itself, causes expansion to accelerate, while rho, by itself, causes expansion to decelerate. But the equation for ##H^2##, by itself, tells you nothing about acceleration or deceleration. What you need to look at is the equation for ##\ddot{a}##.
yes, that's why I spoke of expansion in this post, and not acceleration. dark energy favors expansion contrary to gravity
 
  • #36
Kairos said:
that's why I spoke of expansion in this post, and not acceleration
And did so wrongly if you didn't mean what I said in my previous post. Expansion and acceleration are not the same thing.

Kairos said:
dark energy favors expansion contrary to gravity
No, dark energy favors accelerated expansion.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Kairos
  • #37
@Kairos you are clearly not engaging with what the rest of us are trying to tell you and we are just wasting time at this point. So this thread is closed. Please re-read the responses you have gotten more carefully.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K