Questions about the accelerating Hubble expansion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the nuances of Hubble's Law and the concept of accelerating expansion in cosmology. Participants clarify that Hubble's Law, established in 1929, states that the recession velocity of galaxies is proportional to their distance, but does not imply a constant rate of expansion over time. The introduction of dark energy in the late 1990s was pivotal in explaining the observed acceleration of the universe's expansion, necessitating a model where the Hubble constant decreases over time in a universe dominated by dark energy. Key mathematical distinctions are made regarding the second derivative of the scale factor and its implications for understanding cosmic expansion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hubble's Law and its implications in cosmology
  • Familiarity with the concepts of dark energy and the cosmological constant
  • Basic knowledge of Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric
  • Mathematical proficiency in calculus, particularly derivatives and exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of dark energy on the universe's expansion rate
  • Study the Friedmann equations in cosmology
  • Learn about the role of the cosmological constant in modern cosmological models
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of the Hubble parameter and its time dependence
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the dynamics of cosmic expansion and the role of dark energy in the universe's evolution.

  • #31
Kairos said:
If H will approaches a constant value given by the cosmological constant, there will still be a continuous acceleration ?(exponential).
If ##H## is asymptotically approaching a constant value, the expansion of the universe is asymptotically approaching exponential. At what point during that process the expansion becomes accelerating depends on the details, but it will become accelerating at some point, and once it does, it will stay accelerating.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #32
In a spatially flat universe the Hubble parameter is given by $$H^2=\frac{8\pi G(\rho_m+\rho_r)}{3}+\frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}$$
##\rho_m## and ##\rho_r## decrease with time and ##\Lambda## stays constant, so the Hubble parameter decreases with time. In the remote future ##\rho_m## and ##\rho_r## will tend to zero and the Hubble parameter will become a constant given by $$H=\sqrt{\frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kairos
  • #33
DAH said:
In a spatially flat universe the Hubble parameter is given by $$H^2=\frac{8\pi G(\rho_m+\rho_r)}{3}+\frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}$$
##\rho_m## and ##\rho_r## decrease with time and ##\Lambda## stays constant, so the Hubble parameter decreases with time. In the remote future ##\rho_m## and ##\rho_r## will tend to zero and the Hubble parameter will become a constant given by $$H=\sqrt{\frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}}$$
Thank you. I understand that the densities decrease and lambda is left alone at the end. What I don't understand is why rho and lambda affect H in the same direction. I would have thought - and + signs since lambda increases expansion while rho slows it down.
 
  • #34
Kairos said:
What I don't understand is why rho and lambda affect H in the same direction. I would have thought - and + signs since lambda increases expansion while rho slows it down.
First, what you mean by "expansion" here is not ##H##, its ##\dot{a}##. They're not the same.

Second, when you say "lambda increases expansion while rho slows it down", what you mean is that dark energy, by itself, causes expansion to accelerate, while rho, by itself, causes expansion to decelerate. But the equation for ##H^2##, by itself, tells you nothing about acceleration or deceleration. What you need to look at is the equation for ##\ddot{a}##.
 
  • #35
PeterDonis said:
First, what you mean by "expansion" here is not ##H##, its ##\dot{a}##. They're not the same.

Second, when you say "lambda increases expansion while rho slows it down", what you mean is that dark energy, by itself, causes expansion to accelerate, while rho, by itself, causes expansion to decelerate. But the equation for ##H^2##, by itself, tells you nothing about acceleration or deceleration. What you need to look at is the equation for ##\ddot{a}##.
yes, that's why I spoke of expansion in this post, and not acceleration. dark energy favors expansion contrary to gravity
 
  • #36
Kairos said:
that's why I spoke of expansion in this post, and not acceleration
And did so wrongly if you didn't mean what I said in my previous post. Expansion and acceleration are not the same thing.

Kairos said:
dark energy favors expansion contrary to gravity
No, dark energy favors accelerated expansion.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Kairos
  • #37
@Kairos you are clearly not engaging with what the rest of us are trying to tell you and we are just wasting time at this point. So this thread is closed. Please re-read the responses you have gotten more carefully.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K