Quetelet rings on LCD displays?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Orthoceras
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lcd Rings
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the appearance of Quetelet rings on LCD displays, specifically when using a flashlight on devices like the Prowise digital whiteboard and laptops such as the Asus Vivobook Flip 14 and Lenovo Chromebook Ideapad Flex 5. Participants explore whether the interference patterns observed can indeed be classified as Quetelet rings, despite the absence of dust. The interference is suggested to arise from a transflector, a part-silvered scatterer used in low-power all-light-readable displays, or potentially from etched micro pits on the glass surface. The conversation emphasizes the need for further investigation into the particles responsible for these patterns.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical interference patterns
  • Familiarity with LCD technology and components, specifically transflectors
  • Basic knowledge of light behavior and reflection
  • Experience with photography techniques for capturing macro images
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and functions of transflective liquid-crystal displays
  • Explore the concept of optical interference and its applications in various technologies
  • Investigate the formation of Quetelet rings and their relevance in optical physics
  • Learn about techniques for photographing interference patterns and macro photography settings
USEFUL FOR

Optical physicists, display technology engineers, photographers interested in macro techniques, and anyone studying light behavior in LCD displays.

Orthoceras
Messages
129
Reaction score
53
When shining a flashlight at particular LCD displays, an interesting interference pattern appears, consisting of parallel or concentric lines. It closely resembles Quetelet rings seen on dusty mirrors and glass panes. Quetelet rings are formed when light from a dust particle interferes with the light from its mirror image.

For example, when shining a flashlight at a digital whiteboard (brand Prowise), such a pattern appears. When moving the flashlight in circles around your eye or the camera lens, the pattern will rotate, without any preferred direction. If you move the flashlight laterally towards your eye or the camera lens, the distance between the interference maxima increases, as illustrated in this video (link). The digital whiteboard was clean, no dust on the glass, so the necessary condition for Quetelet rings seems to be missing.
Quetelet combi.png

C is the position of the mirror image of the camera lens, Ln is the position of the mirror image of the flashlight. Top - camera and lamp equally remote from the screen: interference pattern consists of straight lines. Bottom - camera closer to monitor than lamp: interference pattern consists of concentric circles.I saw the same interference pattern on two laptops, Asus Vivobook Flip 14 and Lenovo Chromebook Ideapad Flex 5. Here too, any dust had been wiped off the screen, so that Quetelet rings were not to be expected.

In summary, two questions are:
1) is it right to call the interference pattern that appears on these LCD displays Quetelet rings?
2) how does this pattern arise at these screens? Which 'particles' have replaced the conventional dust particles? Google wasn't very helpful.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Orthoceras said:
Which 'particles' have replaced the conventional dust particles?
You may be seeing the random dust effect from a transflector, used in low-power all-light-readable displays.

The transflector is a part-silvered scatterer, formed by random deposition on a layer of polymer. It is placed in front of the backlighting, at the back of the LCD sandwich.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transflective_liquid-crystal_display
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
You may be right, but I am not sure what the equivalent particles are, and how they could be photographed. For the time being I prefer thinking the equivalent particles are actually etched micro pits into the smooth glass surface, created for a matte appearance. I took the picture below with my smartphone and a tiny macro lens, accidentally at the right focal distance. Recording it was difficult because my smartphone has an autofocus that seems to avoid focussing at this very narrow surface layer depth.

Prowise2.jpg
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
20K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K