I Quetelet rings on LCD displays?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Orthoceras
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lcd Rings
AI Thread Summary
When shining a flashlight on certain LCD displays, an interference pattern resembling Quetelet rings appears, despite the absence of dust. This pattern can be observed on devices like digital whiteboards and laptops, where the arrangement of light suggests interference from particles, potentially linked to the screen's surface texture. The discussion raises two main questions: whether this pattern can accurately be called Quetelet rings and what particles might be responsible for its formation in the absence of dust. Some suggest that the interference may originate from micro pits etched into the glass for a matte finish or from the transflector layer used in low-power displays. The phenomenon remains unclear, with further investigation needed to identify the exact cause of the observed patterns.
Orthoceras
Messages
125
Reaction score
48
When shining a flashlight at particular LCD displays, an interesting interference pattern appears, consisting of parallel or concentric lines. It closely resembles Quetelet rings seen on dusty mirrors and glass panes. Quetelet rings are formed when light from a dust particle interferes with the light from its mirror image.

For example, when shining a flashlight at a digital whiteboard (brand Prowise), such a pattern appears. When moving the flashlight in circles around your eye or the camera lens, the pattern will rotate, without any preferred direction. If you move the flashlight laterally towards your eye or the camera lens, the distance between the interference maxima increases, as illustrated in this video (link). The digital whiteboard was clean, no dust on the glass, so the necessary condition for Quetelet rings seems to be missing.
Quetelet combi.png

C is the position of the mirror image of the camera lens, Ln is the position of the mirror image of the flashlight. Top - camera and lamp equally remote from the screen: interference pattern consists of straight lines. Bottom - camera closer to monitor than lamp: interference pattern consists of concentric circles.I saw the same interference pattern on two laptops, Asus Vivobook Flip 14 and Lenovo Chromebook Ideapad Flex 5. Here too, any dust had been wiped off the screen, so that Quetelet rings were not to be expected.

In summary, two questions are:
1) is it right to call the interference pattern that appears on these LCD displays Quetelet rings?
2) how does this pattern arise at these screens? Which 'particles' have replaced the conventional dust particles? Google wasn't very helpful.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Orthoceras said:
Which 'particles' have replaced the conventional dust particles?
You may be seeing the random dust effect from a transflector, used in low-power all-light-readable displays.

The transflector is a part-silvered scatterer, formed by random deposition on a layer of polymer. It is placed in front of the backlighting, at the back of the LCD sandwich.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transflective_liquid-crystal_display
 
You may be right, but I am not sure what the equivalent particles are, and how they could be photographed. For the time being I prefer thinking the equivalent particles are actually etched micro pits into the smooth glass surface, created for a matte appearance. I took the picture below with my smartphone and a tiny macro lens, accidentally at the right focal distance. Recording it was difficult because my smartphone has an autofocus that seems to avoid focussing at this very narrow surface layer depth.

Prowise2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top