Undergrad Quick Differential Form Question

Click For Summary
In the discussion about differential forms, the question arises regarding the interpretation of a differential form like (y)dx and its implications for the change in the function as x changes. It is clarified that while (y)dx does not automatically equal zero, the system defined by x≡0 and ydx=0 has solutions that can be overlooked when manipulating the equation, such as dividing by x^2. The example provided illustrates that multiplying by an integrating factor can lead to the loss of solutions, particularly when x is zero. The importance of considering the system of equations before performing operations is emphasized, as not all manipulations preserve the solution set. Understanding these nuances is crucial for correctly solving differential equations involving multiple variables.
Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,198
Reaction score
7,679
I've been going through my book learning about differential equations of multiple variables and I have a quick question about differential forms.

If you are working a problem and get to the point where you're left with a differential form like ##(y)dx##, does that mean that the change in the function as ##x## changes is zero, such that ##(y)dx=0##?

For example, one of the example problems in my book is:$$(2x^2+y)dx+(x^2y-x)dy=0$$
It says that if you multiply the function by the integrating factor ##u(x)=x^{-2}## you get $$(2+yx^{-2})dx+(y-x^{-1})dy=0$$ and you end up losing the solution ##x≡0##.

I understand that plugging 0 into the original equation yields ##(y)dx+(0)dy=0##, but I'm not sure why 0 is a solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##ydx## isn't automatically zero, but the system ( ##x\equiv 0 \wedge ydx=0## ) has a solution which will get lost if we divide by ##x^{2}##. So as always in these cases, consider this system first and in the next case ##x \not\equiv 0\,##.
 
fresh_42 said:
##ydx## isn't automatically zero, but the system ( ##x\equiv 0 \wedge ydx=0## ) has a solution which will get lost if we divide by ##x^{2}##.

I'm sorry but I don't know what that bit in the parentheses means.

fresh_42 said:
So as always in these cases, consider this system first and in the next case ##x \not\equiv 0\,##.

What do you mean by "consider this system first"?
 
I meant ##x \equiv 0## is a possibility at first. In this case we conclude ##ydx=0## which can be integrated and leads to a solution with ##x \equiv 0 ## and ##y = \text{ anything }##. From this point on we can assume ##x \not\equiv 0## and consider this remaining case.
 
Ah okay. Thanks fresh.
 
As a general comment not every operation on your equation/system will preserve the solution set. Remember, e.g., when you have a system of linear equations that anything other than switching rows, non-zero scaling and adding a multiple of one row to another, will change the solution .
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
583
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K