Quick question about free variables

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wumple
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variables
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of free variables in a system of equations, specifically addressing why a particular variable is chosen as free and the implications of that choice. The context is conceptual, focusing on understanding the representation of solutions in a system with infinitely many solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why z is chosen as the free variable in the example system and whether it is possible to express x and z in terms of y instead.
  • Another participant responds that the choice of free parameter is arbitrary, providing an alternative formulation where x is the free variable, leading to a different representation of the solutions.
  • This second participant suggests that z may have been chosen for convenience, as it simplifies the process of solving for x and y.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants acknowledge that the choice of free variable is arbitrary, but there is no consensus on the implications of this choice or the preferred approach to expressing the solution set.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the implications of choosing different free variables or the potential advantages of one choice over another.

wumple
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Hopefully I have this in the right place, it's not a homework question exactly, rather a question I have as I'm reading through my text. I'm learning about free variables. The book gives the example system:

x - z = 2
y + 2z = -1
0 = 0

as an example of a system with infinitely many solutions. I see that the way to express the solution set for this system is by describing the line that the solutions lie on. It says to make z the 'free variable' and make x and y the 'dependent' variables. Then by picking z I can find values for x and y that work. This makes sense to me. But why can't I solve for, say, x and z in terms of y? Why do I have to pick z as the free variable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The free parameter you choose is arbitrary, so just as you could say, like the book, that z is free and then

[tex] (x,y,z)=(2+z,-1-2z,z)[/tex]

you could also have said that x was your free parameter and stated the solutions as

[tex] (x,y,z)=(x,3-2x,-2+x)[/tex]

I think they must have chosen z because, in this case, it is easier to solve for x and y.
 
Thanks so much!
 
Anytime!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K