Quick question concerning conversions

  • Thread starter Thread starter wtf_albino
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
To convert 60 miles per hour to meters per second, the calculation can be set up as (60 Mi/H) * (1609 m/Mi) / (3600 s). This results in 26.8 m/s, which is confirmed to be correct. It is recommended to show unit cancellation in the calculations for clarity. An alternative method involves converting miles to feet first, where 60 mph equals 88 feet per second, then converting to meters. The final answer remains consistent at 26.8 m/s.
wtf_albino
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
my book is rather vague on how to do unit conversions. I have 60 Mi/H and need to get it into M/s. Could i just set it up as:[(60 Mi/H)(1609m)] / 3600 s with this i come out to 26.8 m/s which sounds fairly correct.. am i making any errors?
sorry.. I'm very confused about this!:frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The easiest way, and the way usually taught, is to do each step seperately. So, you would have: \frac{60mi}{hr} * \frac{hr}{60min} * \frac{1min}{60sec} * \frac{1609meters}{1mi} = \frac{26.8meters}{sec}

The miles, hours, and minutes cancel out to give you meters/sec. You want to show how the units cancel out in your work, so in your calculation, you would want it to be 1609meters/mile and 1hr/3600seconds.
 
Last edited:
The answer is correct, but it would be less confusing if one would work out the steps.

60 mi/hr * (1609 m/mi) * (1 hr/3600 s) = 26.8 m/s. Show the ratios.

Also, one could realize that 1 mi = 5280 ft, and 60 mi/hr (60 mph) is the same as 88 ft/sec. Now 88 ft/s * (1 m/ 3.28084 ft) = 26.8 m/s, or 88 ft/s * 0.3048 m/ft = 26.8 m/s
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K