Quick question on Probability Current

Click For Summary
The probability current equation from Griffith's book is discussed, clarifying that the second term indeed involves taking the derivative of the wave function's complex conjugate. The conversation also highlights that Schrödinger's equation encompasses both differential calculus and complex variable calculus, emphasizing the importance of complex analysis in finding solutions. Notable figures like Sommerfeld and Pauli are mentioned as key contributors to this analytical approach. Recommendations for further reading on complex analysis and inquiries about accessing Pauli's lectures are also raised. Understanding these mathematical concepts is essential for grasping quantum mechanics.
Seydlitz
Messages
262
Reaction score
4
Here's the probability current equation as seen in Griffith's book.

j = \frac{\hbar}{2mi}\left(\Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi }{\partial x}- (\frac{\partial \Psi^* }{\partial x})\Psi \right)

Does the second right term instruct us to take the derivative of the wave function complex conjugate? Or for that matter $$\Psi^*$$ this refers to the complex conjugate right?

Secondly, what math topics are included in Schrodinger's equation? Is it only differential calculus or does it also include complex variable calculus?

Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since t \in \mathbb{R}, of course
\frac{\partial \psi^*}{\partial t}=\left (\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} \right )^*.
In principle the Schrödinger equation is a partial differential equation of real arguments for a complex-valued function.

Of course, as always, the use of complex analysis is of great advantage to find solutions. The masters of this approach were Sommerfeld and Pauli. You can read about this in Pauli's marvelous lectures on the subject.
 
vanhees71 said:
Since t \in \mathbb{R}, of course
\frac{\partial \psi^*}{\partial t}=\left (\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} \right )^*.
In principle the Schrödinger equation is a partial differential equation of real arguments for a complex-valued function.

Of course, as always, the use of complex analysis is of great advantage to find solutions. The masters of this approach were Sommerfeld and Pauli. You can read about this in Pauli's marvelous lectures on the subject.

Ok thank you for the information. Should I read some math books about complex analysis or does the basic technique usually discussed in normal calculus books? Where can you watch Pauli's lecture on this?
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K