Hi, I'm reading the article "Galilean Conformal Algebra's and AdS/CFT", 0902.1385v2, and have a quick question about the Schrodinger symmetry group.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The symmetry group consists of the usual Galilean group G(d,1) with rotations, boosts and (space and time) translations. On top of that we have a dilatation symmetry of the form

[tex]

x \rightarrow \lambda x, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ t \rightarrow \lambda^2 t

[/tex]

This one is clear; just plug it in the free Schrodinger equation [itex]S=i\partial_t + \frac{1}{2m}\partial_i^2 [/itex]. Also, we have some sort of "time component special conformal symmetry",

[tex]

x \rightarrow x'= \frac{x}{1+\mu t}, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ t \rightarrow t'= \frac{t}{1+\mu t}

[/tex]

where mu parametrizes the transformation. So again I want to check whether this is really a symmetry. So I calculate

[tex]

\partial_{x} = \frac{\partial x'}{\partial x}\frac{\partial }{\partial x'} + \frac{\partial t'}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial t'} = \frac{1}{(1+\mu t)} \frac{\partial}{\partial x'}

[/tex]

and

[tex]

\partial_t = \frac{\partial x'}{\partial t}\frac{\partial}{\partial x'} + \frac{\partial t'}{\partial t}\frac{\partial}{\partial t'} = \frac{1}{(1+ \mu t)^2}[\frac{\partial}{\partial t'} - \mu x \frac{\partial}{\partial x'}]

[/tex]

Now the question: what is that [itex] -\mu x \partial_{x'}[/itex] term in the last equation doing there; it spoils the symmetry, right? Am I making a stupid calculational mistake or am I misunderstanding something here?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Quick question on the Schrodinger symmetry group

Loading...

Similar Threads - Quick question Schrodinger | Date |
---|---|

B A quick question about entanglement | Dec 17, 2016 |

Schrödinger's cat - quick question | Feb 1, 2016 |

Quick question about experiments done on spin detection | Mar 16, 2015 |

Quick questions regarding BRA KET notation | Jan 29, 2015 |

Quick question on notation of the Hamiltonian | Dec 23, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**