Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Quick Question Regarding the cost of Nuclear Reprocessing

  1. Jan 11, 2012 #1
    I personally advocate reprocessing, however I was wondering why UK and European companies do it even though it is admittedly not cost-effective.

    Am I mistaken in believing that its not cost effective or do these companies reprocess for other reasons? Like a concern over the depletion of natural uranium resources?

    Thanks
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 11, 2012 #2

    QuantumPion

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Either it is required by law, it is government subsidized, or it is simply the most economic solution (i.e. other solutions are even more expensive)
     
  4. Jan 12, 2012 #3
  5. Jan 12, 2012 #4
  6. Feb 27, 2012 #5

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Most European nations do not have substantial indigenous deposits of Uranium. France lacks substantial energy resources. UK and Norway have the North Sea oil and gas, while Germany has substantial coal, and the Nordic countries have hydropower. Many nations are now looking at wind and solar power as alternatives to fossil fuel.

    Recycling was developed as a way to recover unusued fuel material (U-238 and U-235) and recover fissile material, rather than disposing the resource in direct disposal repository.

    Due to the nature of spent fuel (fission product and transuranics), reprocessing and fabrication of reprocessed fuel (usually MOX), must be done remotely. This greatly increases the cost.

    http://world-nuclear.org/info/inf69.html
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Quick Question Regarding the cost of Nuclear Reprocessing
  1. Reprocessed Uranium (Replies: 7)

Loading...