How Rademacher Derived His Formula for Partitioning Integers

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Janitor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Rademacher's formula for partitioning integers is derived using Farey sequences and Ford circles, as indicated in the discussion. The number 24 is significant in this context, appearing in the coefficients of the partition function. The formula involves complex sums of exponentials to the base e, which are essential for understanding the partitioning process. John Conway's layman's book on number theory references this formula but lacks a detailed derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Farey sequences
  • Familiarity with Ford circles
  • Knowledge of partition functions in number theory
  • Basic concepts of exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of Rademacher's partition function formula
  • Study the properties and applications of Farey sequences
  • Explore the significance of Ford circles in number theory
  • Learn about the partition function P(n) and its computational methods
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in advanced topics in partition theory and integer partitions.

Janitor
Science Advisor
Messages
1,107
Reaction score
1
Can anyone sketch out how Rademacher wound up with his formula for the number of ways to partition an integer? Or at least explain why the number 24 shows up in it?

(In the graphic link below, the A coefficients are themselves defined as a certain rather complicated sum of exponentials to the base e.)
 

Attachments

  • p1img1272.gif
    p1img1272.gif
    2.6 KB · Views: 482
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, Nate. In fact I grabbed the formula image file from that very page that you linked. I first came upon the formula in a layman's book on number theory by John Conway, but that book didn't offer a derivation if I recall.
 
Reminds of the solution to the third degree equation!
 
Bumping this up in case some of the newer members can provide some insight.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K