Radial probability distribution (rpd)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of radial probability density (RPD) in quantum mechanics, defined as R(r), the square of the radial wavefunction. It explains how RPD is calculated using the volume of a spherical shell, leading to the equation rpd = R² × 4πr². Participants question the cancellation of the differential dr in the equation and whether the entire wave function should be multiplied by the volume. Clarification is provided that the density function is derived from the cumulative distribution function F(r), where R(r) = dF(r)/dr. This highlights the relationship between probability density and cumulative distribution in quantum mechanics.
brainyman89
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Radial Probability Density = R(r) : Square of the Radial Wavefunction
The required volume is determined by the volume of the SPHERICAL SHELL enclosed between a sphere of radius (r+dr) and a sphere of radius r

rpd = radial probability density × volume of the spherical shell = R2 × 4πr2 drhow then did they cancel the dr and directly write:
rpd = R2 × 4πr2

??

also how could only radial probability be multiplied by volume? shouldn't the whole wave function be multiplied by the volume?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The density function is the derivative of the distribution - that's where the dr went.
 
mathman said:
The density function is the derivative of the distribution - that's where the dr went.

derivative with respect to what?
 
brainyman89 said:
derivative with respect to what?

The cumulative distribution is F(r) and the density function R(r) = dF(r)/dr
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
931
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K