Graduate Radiation Friction: Solving Abraham-Lorentz Eq for Non-Physical Solutions

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Abraham-Lorentz equation, which describes radiative friction for a particle in an electromagnetic field. The user encounters non-physical, runaway solutions when solving the equation numerically, despite expecting a spiral motion with decay due to radiation force. There is uncertainty about the derivation's applicability, particularly regarding its validity for non-periodic functions. The user suggests that the equation's derivation is tailored for periodic motion, which may explain the unexpected results. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying the Abraham-Lorentz equation to different motion types.
gennryAlbius
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
There is a well-known Abraham-Lorentz equation describing radiative friction. Suppose a particle moves in an electromagnetic field.
ma(t)=q(E+vxB) + m(tau)a’(t)

By solving this equation numerically, I get non-physical solutions(runaway solutions) Although, it would seem that an electron in an electromagnetic field should move in a spiral, and due to the presence of a radiation force, its movement should decay (I should get such a result). What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not completely certain, but I believe that if you look at the derivation you will see that it is specifically for periodic motion. I believe that for certain non-periodic functions the runaway and non-causal solutions are known
 
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
464
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K