A Radiation Friction: Solving Abraham-Lorentz Eq for Non-Physical Solutions

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Abraham-Lorentz equation, which describes radiative friction for a particle in an electromagnetic field. The user encounters non-physical, runaway solutions when solving the equation numerically, despite expecting a spiral motion with decay due to radiation force. There is uncertainty about the derivation's applicability, particularly regarding its validity for non-periodic functions. The user suggests that the equation's derivation is tailored for periodic motion, which may explain the unexpected results. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying the Abraham-Lorentz equation to different motion types.
gennryAlbius
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
There is a well-known Abraham-Lorentz equation describing radiative friction. Suppose a particle moves in an electromagnetic field.
ma(t)=q(E+vxB) + m(tau)a’(t)

By solving this equation numerically, I get non-physical solutions(runaway solutions) Although, it would seem that an electron in an electromagnetic field should move in a spiral, and due to the presence of a radiation force, its movement should decay (I should get such a result). What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not completely certain, but I believe that if you look at the derivation you will see that it is specifically for periodic motion. I believe that for certain non-periodic functions the runaway and non-causal solutions are known
 
I'm setting up an analog power supply. I have the transformer bridge and filter capacitors so far. The transformer puts out 30 volts. I am currently using two parallel power transistors and a variable resistor to set the output. It also has a meter to monitor voltage. The question is this. How do I set up a single transistor to remove whats left of the ripple after the filter capacitors. It has to vary along with the control transistors to be constant in its ripple removing. The bases of the...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
838
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
284
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K