A Radiation Friction: Solving Abraham-Lorentz Eq for Non-Physical Solutions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Abraham-Lorentz equation, which describes radiative friction for a particle in an electromagnetic field. The user encounters non-physical, runaway solutions when solving the equation numerically, despite expecting a spiral motion with decay due to radiation force. There is uncertainty about the derivation's applicability, particularly regarding its validity for non-periodic functions. The user suggests that the equation's derivation is tailored for periodic motion, which may explain the unexpected results. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying the Abraham-Lorentz equation to different motion types.
gennryAlbius
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
There is a well-known Abraham-Lorentz equation describing radiative friction. Suppose a particle moves in an electromagnetic field.
ma(t)=q(E+vxB) + m(tau)a’(t)

By solving this equation numerically, I get non-physical solutions(runaway solutions) Although, it would seem that an electron in an electromagnetic field should move in a spiral, and due to the presence of a radiation force, its movement should decay (I should get such a result). What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not completely certain, but I believe that if you look at the derivation you will see that it is specifically for periodic motion. I believe that for certain non-periodic functions the runaway and non-causal solutions are known
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top