Undergrad Radiative collapse of an electron in a classical atom

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the energy radiated by an electron during one revolution in a classical atom using the Larmor Formula: dE/dt = [(-2/3) * e² * a²] / c³. Participants suggest finding the time of a classical revolution and multiplying the energy loss per time by that time to determine the total energy loss. The energy lost per revolution is estimated to be approximately e⁵ / (m³/₂ * r * c³), which is significantly smaller than the overall energy, validating the initial approximation. If the energy loss becomes substantial, a differential equation must be solved as acceleration becomes time-dependent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Larmor Formula in classical electrodynamics
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics, particularly orbital motion
  • Familiarity with differential equations and their applications
  • Basic concepts of atomic structure and electron behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Larmor Formula in detail
  • Learn about classical mechanics and the motion of electrons in atoms
  • Explore differential equations and their role in physics, particularly in energy loss scenarios
  • Investigate quantum mechanics principles that explain electron stability in atoms
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students studying classical mechanics and electrodynamics, and anyone interested in the behavior of electrons in atomic structures.

LauritsT
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello!

How do I find how much energy does electron radiate during one revolution if the energy radiation rate is given by Larmor Formula: dE /dt = [(− 2/3)* e2* a2]/ c3. Should I use the chain rule? At the moment I only want a hint how to solve this.

With best regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can find the time of a classical revolution and multiply the energy loss per time by that time. Then compare the result to the overall energy. If it is small the approach works, if it is large then dE/dt will change during the orbit and you cannot use this simple approach. Then you have to solve a differential equation as a depends on t now.
 
  • Like
Likes LauritsT
mfb said:
You can find the time of a classical revolution and multiply the energy loss per time by that time. Then compare the result to the overall energy. If it is small the approach works, if it is large then dE/dt will change during the orbit and you cannot use this simple approach. Then you have to solve a differential equation as a depends on t now.

Thanks! So very roughly speaking, the overallenergy that the electron should have is K~ e2 and the energy lost per revolution is E~ e5 / (m3/2 * r * c3). So since the energy lost per revolution is much smaller (~1030 times smaller) then the approach works. In the case when dE/dt is large: the differential equation already has t as a variable as I understand, since dE=...dt, yes?
 
Yes, you'll get ##dE=c (a(t))^2 dt## with some constant c - but you don't know a(t), so you probably want to rewrite that as ##dE=c (a(E))^2 dt##, plug in a(E) and then solve for E(t). But with a small energy loss, that is not necessary.
 
  • Like
Likes LauritsT
LauritsT said:
So since the energy lost per revolution is much smaller (~1030 times smaller)

That doesn't sound right to me. This leads to atoms stable for thousands of years, when I thought it was well under a microsecond.
 
  • Like
Likes LauritsT
Vanadium 50 said:
That doesn't sound right to me. This leads to atoms stable for thousands of years, when I thought it was well under a microsecond.

Thanks for the tip! I've read also that electron should fall onto the nucleus in 10-11 seconds. But since it the energy of only one full rotation with respect to the whole energy (kinetic) then I didn't think of it as a fault right away. I will check it once more.

//edit: just to be clear my result was before dE/K = 10-30 where dE is energy lost in one revolution and K is kinetic energy. But once again, I will check my calculations
 
I get nW, or 10 GeV/s. At a few PHz classical revolution frequency, this is a few µeV per revolution. Not 1030 times smaller, but still small enough to make the initial approximation reasonable.
Calculated for a distance of 1 Ångström.
 
  • Like
Likes LauritsT

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K