Radius of a circle whose area is of 2 other cirlces

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of a circle whose area is the sum of the areas of two other circles. The subject area includes geometry, specifically the properties of circles and area calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how to derive the radius of a new circle from the areas of two existing circles. Questions arise about whether a direct calculation method exists that avoids traditional area-to-radius conversion steps.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the relationship between area and radius, suggesting that the area is proportional to the square of the radius. Others have provided equations for calculating the radius based on the areas of the two circles, indicating a productive exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of varying radii for the two circles, prompting questions about how to handle different initial conditions in the calculations. The discussion also touches on the application of Pythagorean theorem concepts in relation to the areas of circles.

Alexenn
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



--SOLVED--

It seems, that you just apply the pythageos thereom to 'A' and 'B' =)---------------
Lets say I have a circle 'A' with radius 6cm, and a circle 'B' with radius 6cm. These two circles would have an area of 113.097cm^2. When both are combined they would have an area of 226.194cm^2.

Is there a way that you can calculate the new radius (or diameter) without having to get the area -> divide by PI -> take the square root? (which would equal 8.485cm^2 in this case)

Also, how would this problem be handled with 2 different inital radiuses? eg. Circle 'A' has radius 5cm, and circle 'B' has radius 11cm.

Thankyou

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not Pythagoras' theorem. It's simply that area is proportional to the square of a characteristic length dimension when scaling a shape. (Not restricted to circles). So if I scale a shape up by a factor of 3 in lengths, the area increases by a factor of 9.
 
So what you're looking for is to add the area of two circles with varying radii, say, r1 radius for the first circle and r2 for the second.

The area of each circle is

[tex]A_1=\pi r_1^2[/tex]

[tex]A_2=\pi r_2^2[/tex]

and the sum of these is

[tex]A_1+A_2=\pi (r_1^2+r_2^2)[/tex]

You want this to be equal to a third circle A3 with unknown radius r3 so what you're looking for is to solve for r3 in the following equation:

[tex]A_1+A_2=A_3=\pi (r_1^2+r_2^2)=\pi r_3^2[/tex]

So, all you need to do is solve for r3 in

[tex]\pi (r_1^2+r_2^2)=\pi r_3^2[/tex]

and you have yourself a formula for converting the area of 2 varying circles into 1. You can also extend this idea to convert any number of circles into 1.

Edit: I've never actually noticed it before, but yes, you're right about the pythagorean formula being applied here :smile:
 
Mentallic said:
Edit: I've never actually noticed it before, but yes, you're right about the pythagorean formula being applied here :smile:

And the way in which you can "see" that is to think about the implication of Pythagoras' Theorem for areas of squares whose side is equal to each of the lengths of a right triangle, and draw incircles in each of those squares. The areas of the incircles are also related to one another as the the areas of the squares to one another. Each of the incircles has a diameter equal to the respective side of the right triangle. And therefore each of the incircles has an area which is related to the same constant of proportionality (1/4) to the larger circles whose radius is equal to the respective side; the proportionality constants cancel out, giving the same inter-relationship between the areas of these larger circles as the smaller circles and the squares adjoining the sides, which is specified by the Pythagorean Theorem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
25K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K