MHB Calculating Radius of Circular Section from Sphere and Plane Intersection

AI Thread Summary
To find the radius of the circular section formed by the intersection of the sphere defined by x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 49 and the plane 2x + 3y - z - 5√14 = 0, one approach is to calculate the distance from the sphere's center to the plane. This distance can be determined using the formula d = |Ax0 + By0 + Cz0 + D| / √(A^2 + B^2 + C^2). Once the distance d is found, the radius r of the circular section can be derived using the right triangle formed by the sphere's radius and the distance to the plane. This method simplifies the problem without needing to substitute z back into the sphere's equation. The final radius of the circular section can then be calculated effectively.
marutkpadhy
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Find the radius of the circular section of the sphere of the sphere x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 49 by the plane 2x+3y-z-5 \sqrt{14}= 0
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suppose you solve the equation of the plane for $z$, and then substitute for $z$ into the equation of the sphere...what do you get?
 
View attachment 2708

I think it is easier to find the distance $d$ from the center of the sphere to the plane (recall the the distance from $(x_0,y_0,z_0)$ to $Ax+By+Cz+D=0$ is $\dfrac{Ax_0+By_y+Cz_0+D}{\sqrt{A^2+B^2+C^2}}$) and then find the radius $r$ of the required circular section from the right triangle.
 

Attachments

  • circle1.png
    circle1.png
    3.6 KB · Views: 87
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top