MHB Rahul's question at Yahoo Answers regarding hyperbolic and circular trigonometry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equation tanh²(x/2) = tan²(θ/2) given that cosh(x) = sec(θ). The proof starts with the definition of tanh(x/2) and uses the identities for sinh and cosh to derive the formula tanh²(x/2) = (cosh(x) - 1) / (cosh(x) + 1). By substituting cosh(x) with sec(θ), the expression transforms into (sec(θ) - 1) / (sec(θ) + 1). Finally, applying trigonometric identities leads to the conclusion that tanh²(x/2) equals tan²(θ/2), thus completing the proof.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

If coshx=sec (theta) then prove that tanh^2(x/2)= tan^2 (theta/2)?


tanh^2 (x/2)=coshx-1/.coshx+1
this is how the problem starts i can't understan how did they get this.. can anybody help me out...

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Rahul,

Let's begin with:

$$\tanh\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)=\frac{\sinh\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}{\cosh\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}$$

Next, we can employ the definitions:

$$\sinh(u)\equiv\frac{e^u-e^{-u}}{2}$$

$$\cosh(u)\equiv\frac{e^u+e^{-u}}{2}$$

To obtain:

$$\tanh\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)=\frac{\dfrac{e^{\frac{x}{2}}-e^{-\frac{x}{2}}}{2}}{\dfrac{e^{\frac{x}{2}}+e^{-\frac{x}{2}}}{2}}$$

Multiplying the right side by $$1=\frac{2}{2}$$ we obtain:

$$\tanh\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)=\frac{e^{\frac{x}{2}}-e^{-\frac{x}{2}}}{e^{\frac{x}{2}}+e^{-\frac{x}{2}}}$$

Squaring both sides, we obtain:

$$\tanh^2\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)=\frac{e^{x}+e^{-x}-2}{e^{x}+e^{-x}+2}$$

Dividing each term in the numerator and denominator on the right by $2$ we may write:

$$\tanh^2\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)=\frac{\dfrac{e^{x}+e^{-x}}{2}-1}{\dfrac{e^{x}+e^{-x}}{2}+1}$$

Using the definition for the hyperbolic cosine function, we obtain:

$$\tanh^2\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)=\frac{\cosh(x)-1}{\cosh(x)+1}$$

Now, we are given $$\cosh(x)=\sec(\theta)$$, and so we may write:

$$\tanh^2\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)=\frac{\sec(\theta)-1}{\sec(\theta)+1}$$

Multiply the right side by $$1=\frac{\cos(\theta)}{\cos(\theta)}$$ to get:

$$\tanh^2\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)=\frac{1-\cos(\theta)}{1+\cos(\theta)}$$

In the numerator use the double-angle identity for cosine $$\cos(2u)=1-2\sin^2(u)$$ and in the denominator use the double-angle identity for cosine $$\cos(2u)=2\cos^2(u)-1$$ to get:

$$\tanh^2\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)=\frac{1-\left(1-2\sin^2\left(\dfrac{\theta}{2} \right) \right)}{1+\left(2\cos^2\left(\dfrac{\theta}{2} \right)-1 \right)}=\frac{2\sin^2\left(\dfrac{\theta}{2} \right)}{2\cos^2\left(\dfrac{\theta}{2} \right)}$$

Hence, we have:

$$\tanh^2\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)=\tan^2\left(\dfrac{\theta}{2} \right)$$

And this is what we were asked to show.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top