MHB Raju had 5 times as much money as Ann. How much did Raju have at first?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnx1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Money
Johnx1
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Raju and Ann saved a total of 1560 dollars. After Raju gave Ann 50 dollars, Raju had 5 times as much money as Ann. How much did Raju have at first?Number of dollars saved = R
Number of dollars saved = A

1) We know Raju and Ann saved 1560 dollars

R + A = 1560

2) (i got confuse at this part) Raju gave Ann 50 dollars, Raju had 5 times as much money as Ann

R = 5A (not sure if this is the correct way to do it)So then I did => 5A + A = 1560. So A = 260.

Then, I put it back to R = 5A, and then I added 50. So the answer is R = 1350.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
After Raju gave Ann 50 dollars Raju had \(R-50\) and Ann had \(A+50\), so we want:

$$R-50=5(A+50)$$

Now, as you observed:

$$R+A=1560\implies A=1560-R$$

And so we can now substitute into the first equation to get an equation in \(R\) only:

$$R-50=5((1560-R)+50)$$

Solving this equation, you will indeed find \(R=1350\).
 
MarkFL said:
After Raju gave Ann 50 dollars Raju had \(R-50\) and Ann had \(A+50\), so we want:

$$R-50=5(A+50)$$

Thank you for this.

When I went back to this question, I had a feeling that I was making math up. Thanks again.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top