Money per person and 2nd generation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter caters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generation Money Per
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a conceptual framework for assigning gender to numbers based on their mathematical properties, particularly focusing on prime and composite numbers, as well as the implications of these assignments for reproduction rules in a hypothetical mathematical world. The conversation also touches on the distribution of wealth among these numbers based on a fictional economic model.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines a system where the gender of numbers alternates based on primality, with specific rules for composites based on the number of factors.
  • Reproduction rules are proposed, including various mating scenarios for male, female, and hermaphroditic numbers, influenced by the concept of sex chromosomes.
  • A mathematical question is posed regarding the number of second-generation numbers produced under these rules, incorporating various mathematical operations.
  • Another participant questions the origins of these rules, asking if they stem from a specific background or are simply arbitrary.
  • A participant explains that the gender assignment is influenced by number gender synesthesia and biological concepts of sex determination, linking it to meiosis and fertilization.
  • One reply suggests that the original poster should explore their own framework further to clarify inconsistencies and derive interesting results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the origins and validity of the proposed rules, with some seeking clarification and others suggesting further exploration. No consensus is reached regarding the framework's coherence or its implications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the relationships between mathematical properties and biological concepts, which may not be universally accepted. The proposed rules and their implications remain speculative and are not grounded in established mathematical or biological principles.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring the intersection of mathematics and conceptual frameworks, particularly in creative or theoretical contexts, as well as individuals interested in synesthesia and its implications for understanding numerical properties.

caters
Messages
229
Reaction score
10
In my base 10 math world there are rules for the gender of 1st generation numbers. They are:

Primes alternate between 1 gender and another(specifically M and F)

Composites have 3 more rules related to number of factors:
M factors > F factors = M
M factors < F factors = F
M factors = F factors = H(hermaphrodite)

Now there are even more rules for reproduction(hermaphrodites are bifertile in Math World meaning that they produce both eggs and sperm). They are:

Male mates with Female
Female mates with Male(classic reproduction rules)

AND

Hermaphrodite mates with Female
Hermaphrodite mates with Male
Hermaphrodite mates with Hermaphrodite(resulting in 2 pregnancies)
Hermaphrodite mates with Self

All of this is because of 4 sex chromosomes like this:
XXXX: Female
XXXY: Male
XXYY: Hermaphrodite
XYYY: Male

0,2,5,10,11,17,20,22,23,31,34,40,41,42,43,46,47,50 ,55,59,61,62,68,71,79,80,82,85,88,89,92,94,and 100 are male

4,8,16,32,64,and 25 are hermaphroditic

the rest of the 101 numbers are female.

Given these reproduction rules and that every number gets x chances of reproduction and these operations:
+
-
*
/
^
nth root
and
tetration
how many 2nd generation numbers are there including repeats assuming that every time a number mates that it is either with a different number or with the same number but a different operational chromosome expressed?

Also the mother is one of the addends for +, the minuend for -, one of the factors(specifically the multiplicand which is what you are multiplying) for *, the dividend for /, the base for ^, the index for nth root, and both the base and exponent for tetration. So this reduces the potential amount in half since it is always Female or Hermaphrodite (Operation) Male, Hermaphrodite, or Self.

Also, assuming everything is free until all the x+101 numbers get an equal amount of money and 1 person produces per year 13,146,337,252,759,428 dollars(5 of each denomination of the third Zimbabwe dollar * 73(which is 365/5)), and that 5 people are producing money how many years will it take to get an equal amount of money to everyone? How much money will each number have after those y years?

Just to clarify the Third Zimbabwe Dollar denominations from 1 up are:

1 dollar
5 dollars
10 dollars
20 dollars
100 dollars
500 dollars
1000 dollars
10000 dollars
20000 dollars
50000 dollars
100000 dollars
500000 dollars
1 million dollars
10 million dollars
100 million dollars
200 million dollars
500 million dollars
1 billion dollars
5 billion dollars
10 billion dollars
20 billion dollars
50 billion dollars
10 trillion dollars
20 trillion dollars
50 trillion dollars
and
100 trillion dollars
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Does this have some specific background or is it just a random collection of weird rules?
 
As far as the gender of first generation numbers that is from number gender synesthesia.

For the chromosomes it is from my knowledge that XX is female and XY is male in most organisms and that hermaphrodites can be fertile.

For the mother being the first number in the equation that is because the mother is the most important relative.

The reproduction rules are from my knowledge of meiosis and fertilization.
 
It's your invention, why don't you investigate it and tell us about the results, if you think they are interesting? Along the way you might be able to remove what appear to be inconsistencies between the definitions of gender using prime factors (which is pretty clear) and using chromasomes (which seems less clear to me).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K