Random number generation: probability of 2nd smallest >0.002

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating probabilities related to random number generation, specifically focusing on the second smallest number among 100 independent and identically distributed random variables. The first question addresses the probability that the largest number is less than 0.9, which is calculated as 0.9 raised to the power of 100. The second question explores the probability that the second smallest number is greater than 0.002, which is derived from two scenarios: all numbers being greater than 0.002 and exactly one number being less. The final probability for the second question is approximately 0.9826, indicating a high likelihood that the second smallest number exceeds 0.002. The discussion emphasizes the use of binomial distribution and cumulative distribution functions in solving these probability problems.
psie
Messages
315
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
One hundred numbers, uniformly distributed in the interval ##(0,1)## are generated by a computer. What is the probability that the largest number is at most ##0.9##? What is the probability that the second smallest number is at least ##0.002##?
Relevant Equations
The extreme order variables ##X_{(1)}=\min\{X_1,\ldots,X_{100}\}## and ##X_{(100)}=\max\{X_1,\ldots,X_{100}\}## have cdf ##F_{X_{(1)}}(x)=1-(1-F(x))^{100}## and ##F_{X_{(100)}}(x)=(F(x))^{100}## respectively, where ##F## is the cdf of the iid ##X_1,\ldots,X_{100}##.
The first question is fairly straightforward. The density of ##X## (i.e. one of the iid r.v.s. ##X_1,\ldots,X_{100}##) is just ##f(x)=1## for ##0<x<1## and ##0## otherwise. The cdf ##F## is therefore ##F(x)=x## for ##0<x<1##, ##F(x)=0## for ##x<0## and ##F(x)=1## for ##x>1##. In the first question, we are interested in \begin{align*} P(X_{(100)}<0.9)&=F_{X_{(100)}}(0.9) \\ &=(0.9)^{100}.\end{align*}For the 2nd question, I don't know how to approach this and I'm stuck. The cdf of arbitrary order variables has not been derived yet. I know we are looking for ##P(X_{(2)}>0.002)=1-P(X_{(2)}<0.002)##. But maybe there's a workaround. I only know the formulas in the relevant equations above. Grateful for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

so the condition in the second question is met in two cases:
a) if all 100 numbers are > 0.002 -- which has a probability ...
b) if one number is < 0.002 AND all others are > 0.002

one number is < 0.002 has probability ...​
99 others > 0.002 probability ...​

##\ ##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Orodruin and psie
BvU said:
Hi,

so the condition in the second question is met in two cases:
a) if all 100 numbers are > 0.002 -- which has a probability ...
b) if one number is < 0.002 AND all others are > 0.002

one number is < 0.002 has probability ...​
99 others > 0.002 probability ...​

##\ ##
Ok. So (a) occurs with probability \begin{align*}P(X_1>0.002,X_2>0.002,\ldots,X_n>0.002)&=\prod_{i=1}^{100} (1-P(X_i<0.002))\\ &=(1-F(0.002))^{100} \\ &=(0.998)^{100}\approx 0.819.\end{align*} But for (b), I am not sure how to proceed. We've got ##100## possibilities for one of the sample points to be less than ##<0.002## and all others ##>0.002##, right? Do we just multiply ##100## with $$P(X_1>0.002,X_2>0.002,\ldots,X_k<0.002,\ldots, X_n>0.002)?$$ If one has obtained the probability for (b), I am not sure how one obtains the (total) probability for the second question.
 
Ok, I think I know now how to calculate the probability in (b). We are essentially making 100 trials and looking for success (i.e. that a number is greater 0.002) in 99 of the trials. The success probability is $$P(X>0.002)=1-P(X<0.002)=1-F(0.002)=0.998.$$ Now, the probability that the count ##Y=99## follows a binomial distribution, so $$P(Y=99)=\binom{100}{99} (0.998)^{99}(0.002)^{100-99}\approx 0.164.$$As (a) and (b) are disjoint events, we have that the probability for the 2nd question is $$0.164+0.819=0.983.$$That seems like a very high probability.
 
I agree it's rather high.
I painted myself in a corner trying to get the result coming from the other side: there are ##\binom{100}{2}=4950## possible pairs. Require both ##\ <0.002## gives ##0.0198## --- which is not ## 1-0.9826 = 0.0174##.
Oh boy .... :nb)

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
trying to get the result coming from the other side: there are ##\binom{100}{2}=4950## possible pairs. Require both ##\ <0.002## gives ##0.0198##
So that is the probability that exactly 2 numbers are less than 0.002. What happens if exactly 3 numbers are less than 0.002?
 
I think the answer I got is correct. :smile:

We can check it via Wikipedia and WolframAlpha. The density of the 2nd order variable ##U_{(2)}## (see Wikipedia) is $$f_{U_{(2)}}(x) = \frac{100!}{98!} x (1-x)^{98}.$$Integrating from ##0.002## to ##1## gives (see WolframAlpha) approximately ##0.983##.
 
pbuk said:
So that is the probability that exactly 2 numbers are less than 0.002. What happens if exactly 3 numbers are less than 0.002?
Yep, the check I tried was too hasty : forgot the (1-0.002)^98 and overlooked the 3, 4, 5, etc. o:)
Good catch !

##\ ##
 
psie said:
I think the answer I got is correct. :smile:
So do I, although perhaps a little over-complicated getting there: you seem to have focussed on PDFs and CDFs but both parts of the problem can be more simply answered from binomial fundamentals.

psie said:
What is the probability that the largest number is at most ##0.9##?
This is the probability that all 100 numbers are less than 0.9: ## 0.9^{100} ##.

psie said:
What is the probability that the second smallest number is at least ##0.002##?
This is the probability that either:
- all 100 numbers are greater than 0.002: ## 0.998^{100} \approx 0.8186##; or
- exactly 1 number is less than 0.002: ## \binom{100}{1} 0.002^1 0.998^{99} \approx 0.1640 ##.
Adding the two (they are as you say mutually exclusive) gives the answer
$$ 0.998^{100} + \binom{100}{1} 0.002^1 0.998^{99} \approx 0.9826 $$

Note that you can often boost your confidence in an answer with a quick numerical simulation.
 
  • Like
Likes psie and BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K