Range of alpha particles in a silicon detector

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the range of alpha particles in silicon, focusing on the integration of stopping power and the units used for range measurement. Participants explore the mathematical approach to integration and the significance of using g/cm² as a unit of measurement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks assistance with the integration of stopping power to find the range of alpha particles in silicon.
  • Another suggests assuming a constant stopping power for estimation and inquires about the kinetic energy of the alpha particle.
  • There is a discussion about the units of range being expressed in g/cm², with one participant questioning the interchangeability of g/cm² and cm.
  • Clarification is provided that to convert g/cm² to cm, one must consider the density of silicon.
  • Participants discuss the rationale behind using g/cm² for range measurements, noting that it reflects the mass of the target material rather than just its thickness.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about the integration process and the use of units, with no consensus reached on the best approach to the integration or the implications of the units used.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions needed for integration and the dependence of stopping power on alpha particle energy. The discussion also highlights the importance of density in converting units.

neural_jam
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm trying to find the range of α-particles in silicon; I can work out the stopping power, \frac{dE}{dx}, but the reference I'm using then states that I need to integrate it as follows:

R=\int_T^0 (-\frac{dE}{dx} ) ^{-1} dE

The thing is, I'm not sure as to how to even start this integration, can anyone help?

I can actually look up the value using the page below to calculate it, but I'd like to check it by doing it myself.

http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Star/Text/ASTAR.html

Also this page gives the units of range in g/cm2, can anyone explain why it's this and not just cm or m? I've seen in other places where g/cm2 and cm seem to be interchangeable, so if it gives the range as 7.375x 10-03g/cm2, can I just use it as 7.375x 10-03cm?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
neural_jam said:
Hi,
The thing is, I'm not sure as to how to even start this integration, can anyone help?

Also this page gives the units of range in g/cm2, can anyone explain why it's this and not just cm or m? I've seen in other places where g/cm2 and cm seem to be interchangeable, so if it gives the range as 7.375x 10-03g/cm2, can I just use it as 7.375x 10-03cm?

Try to do the integration by assuming a constant stopping power. The stopping power is different for different alpha energies, but gives at least an estimation of the range. What is the kinetic energy of your alpha particle?

You of course cannot make g/cm2 to cm just by changing the unit. What happens if you multiply this by the density of silicon?
 
deccard said:
You of course cannot make g/cm2 to cm just by changing the unit. What happens if you multiply this by the density of silicon?

Did you mean divide it by the density of Si? If so you get cm, which is very useful, thankyou.

However, I don't quite understand what I'm doing when I do this; I mean how do they get to the g/cm2 units in the first place? Also, why do they use this unit for range instead of cm or m or whatever?

Many thanks
 
Last edited:
neural_jam said:
Did you mean divide it by the density of Si? If so you get cm, which is very useful, thankyou.

However, I don't quite understand what I'm doing when I do this; I mean how do they get to the g/cm2 units in the first place? Also, why do they use this unit for range instead of cm or m or whatever?

*Ahem*, Yes I mean divide. Thicknesses are many times given in g/cm2 for for example beam target's. This is because the absorption of radiation in a target is dependent on the mass in the target.

2 cm gaseous nitrogen target is very different from 2 cm lead target. Instead of saying that you have 2 cm nitrogen target with density of 1.03mg/cm3 and 2 cm lead target with density of 11.3g/cm3, you could just say that you have targets with thicknesses 2.06mg/cm2 and 22.6g/cm2 without actually mentioning the target material and people already have an idea how radiation is absorbed in the target.

What a about the integration did you get it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K