Range of Weak Values: Explaining Eigenvalues of A

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter msumm21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Range Weak
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
msumm21
Messages
247
Reaction score
28
The weak value of an observable A with pre-selected state ##\psi## and post-selected state ##\phi## is defined as:
[itex]A_w =\langle \phi | A | \psi \rangle / \langle \phi | \psi \rangle[/itex]

References like Wikipedia then include a comment that the weak value is not bounded by the range of eigenvalues of A, e.g. when ##\phi## and ##\psi## are nearly orthogonal the value gets larger than the biggest eigenvalue of A. I know the denominator is small in such cases, but when I do the math it seems like the numerator should shrink in proportion and the range of the weak values should not exceed the range of the eigenvalues of A, let me explain and please let me know if you see my mistake.

If I rewrite ##\psi## as a linear combinations of the eigenstates of A, e.g.
[itex]\psi = \sum_i \psi_i |A_i \rangle[/itex]
then do the math I just end up with a weighted average of the eigenvalues ([itex]\alpha_i[/itex]) of A, i.e.
[itex]A_w = \sum_i w_i \alpha_i / \sum_i w_i[/itex] where
[itex]w_i = \psi_i \langle \phi | A_i \rangle[/itex]

Anyone see what I missed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You miss the possibility that absolute values of [itex]w_i[/itex] are not small, but have different signs (or phases if [itex]w_i[/itex] are complex) such that [itex]\sum_i w_i[/itex] is small.
 
Last edited:
Ah yes. Thanks Demystifier!