Ranking "by eye" bi-material cross sections for strength/stiffness

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on ranking four thin-walled cross sections made of titanium and aluminum under pure torsion. Titanium has a modulus of elasticity (E) of 100 GPa, while aluminum has an E of 75 GPa. Participants are encouraged to justify their rankings based on reasoning rather than numerical values, emphasizing the importance of torque superposition and compatibility equations in determining torsional stiffness and strength. The analysis assumes that the sections are loaded solely in torsion without end restraints against warping.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torsion in structural mechanics
  • Familiarity with shear modulus and its relationship to modulus of elasticity
  • Knowledge of torque superposition and compatibility equations
  • Experience with analyzing thin-walled cross sections
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of shear modulus from modulus of elasticity using the equation G=##f(v, E)##
  • Learn about the application of torque superposition in structural analysis
  • Explore compatibility equations for deflection in bi-material cross sections
  • Investigate the analysis of thin-walled open sections in torsion
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, materials scientists, and students studying mechanics of materials who are interested in analyzing and optimizing the performance of bi-material cross sections under torsional loads.

greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Howdy guys,
Say we have been given the four thin-walled cross sections below loaded in pure torsion, where the material in black, titanium, has E=100GPa and the one grey one, aluminum, E=75GPa(no clue why Es are given, as I would have expected the shear modulus, G... maybe it is expected to use the equation G=##f(v, E)## to derive the latter).
But anyways, the point now would be to rank by eye each one of them once from the stiffest to the less stiff cross section, and then from the strongest to the weakest.
As the "by eye" might have led you to think, a reasoning is expected in place of numbers/ratios(or a maybe a more wordy version of the latter) to justify the resulting ranking.

Therefore, I would be curious to see how you guys would reason such an exercise and see the thought process behind a reasonable ranking. For the bi-material strips specifically, I really wouldn't know how to tackle this without relying on the bookkeeping process of:
-torques superposition, ##T=T_1+T_2##;
-compatibility equation for the deflection rate to be equal in both parts of the cs, ##\frac{d\theta}{dz}=\frac{3T_1}{G_1s_1t^3}=\frac{3T_2}{G_2s_2t^3}##
-solving for the individual torques and then computing the individuals ##\tau_{max}## and ##\frac{d\theta}{dz}##
Any ideas? :)

1669759457223.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A search using terms torsion thin wall open sections brought back memories of strength of materials class where this class of sections was analyzed. These sections are analyzed as the sum of three separate flat bars. The torsional stiffness of each bar is proportional to the shear modulus. This assumes that the sections are loaded only in torsion, and the ends are not restrained against warping.