Rate of Convergence for g(x) Limit at x=0

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ductiletoaste
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Rate
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the rate of convergence for the limit of the function g(x) as x approaches 0, where g(x) is defined as f(x)^(1/3) and f(x) is a complex expression involving exponential and trigonometric functions. The conversation includes elements of Taylor series expansion and the definitions of rate of convergence in a mathematical context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the function g(x) and seeks to understand the rate of convergence as x approaches 0.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the professor's explanation of convergence and its relation to the limit of G(h) and F(h).
  • A participant questions the understanding of "rate of convergence" and suggests it is typically relative to another function.
  • There is a clarification attempt regarding the definitions of O(G(h)) and o(G(h)), indicating different rates of convergence.
  • Some participants express frustration with the clarity of the definitions and the original question posed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the concept of rate of convergence, with some agreeing on the definitions while others find them confusing. There is no consensus on the specific rate of convergence for g(x) as x approaches 0.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the use of Taylor series and limits, but there are unresolved aspects regarding the assumptions made in the original question and the definitions provided by the professor.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in mathematical analysis, particularly in the context of limits and convergence, may find this discussion relevant.

ductiletoaste
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Ok i have a question I am have been stuck on for a while.
g(x) = f(x)^(1/3) and f(x)^(1/3) = (e^x-cos(x)-x-x^2)^(1/3)

What is the rate of convergence for lim x->0 of g(x)?

Now to make it easier i took the taylor poly of the crazy function to degree 3. Which is (x^3)/6

The part I am confused about is what our prof told us in class...
lim h->0 of G(h) = 0, and lim h->0 of F(h) = L
We say that F(h) converges to L with a Rate of Convergence O(G(h)).

So what is the rate of convergence? and what is o(G(h))?
Thank you for any direction you can provide!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone give me any advice?
 
The description you gave of the professor's explanation is very confusing.
 
ur telling me. I have been lost and that's a not a description its a direct quote from one of his lectures! But for the sake of helping me figure this out let's forget the whole confusing explantion. how would u normally find the Rate of convergence of g(x) = f(x)^(1/3) and f(x)^(1/3) = (e^x-cos(x)-x-x^2)^(1/3)

What is the rate of convergence for lim x->0 of g(x)?
 
Could you define "rate of convergence"?
 
no offense but if u don't know what rate of convergence is then u can't hope to answer this question.
 
I've been a mathematician all my life. I never heard that particular term used in an absolute sense, only relative to something else, like x3 -> 0 faster than x2 when x -> 0.
 
Well this was an example problem given to me by a Phd professor. So i can assure you there is nothing wrong with the question.
 
We say that F(h) converges to L with a Rate of Convergence O(G(h)).

So what is the rate of convergence? and what is o(G(h))?
The first statement says that |F(h)-L| -> 0 at the same rate as G(h)->0.
The second statement means that |F(h)-L| -> 0 faster than G(h) -> 0.

Did you edit the statement after first posting?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K