Rationale of the position operator?

Click For Summary
The position operator in quantum mechanics is defined as multiplication by x only in the position basis, where the wave function is expressed as ψ(x) = <x|ψ>. When measuring a particle's position, its state collapses into an eigenstate of the position basis, represented by a delta function δ(x-q) centered at the measured position q. This leads to the conclusion that multiplying the delta function by x results in qδ(x-q), confirming that delta functions are eigenfunctions of the position operator. The expectation value of the position operator can be derived from two equivalent formulas, reinforcing that the operator acts as multiplication by x in its eigenbasis representation. Understanding this framework is essential for grasping the role of the position operator in quantum mechanics.
PerpStudent
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Why is the position operator of a particle on the x-axis defined by x multiplied by the wave function? Is there an intuitive basis for this or is it merely something that simply works in QM?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Multiplication by x is not in general the position operator. "x multiplied by the wave function" would be the correct recipe if by wave function you specifically mean the particle's state ket projected onto the position basis, ψ(x)=<x|ψ>. But often people speak about other "wavefunctions" such as the particle's state representation in momentum space, ψ'(p)=<p|ψ>. In the momentum basis, the (one-dimensonal) position operator is \hat{x}=i\hbar\frac{\partial }{\partial p}

Multiplication by x is the position operator only in the position basis. Measuring the position of a particle causes the particle's state to collapse into an eigenstate of the position basis. This means it has a definite position. If you know a particle's position exactly, let's say it's at q along the x-axis, then the probability of finding the particle at q is 100% and the probability of finding it anywhere else is 0%. So if a particle has the definite position q, then its wavefunction in the position basis must look like a dirac delta function centered at q, which would be written δ(x-q).

Multiplying the dirac delta function by x,
xδ(x-q) = qδ(x-q)
since δ(x-q) is zero everywhere except at x=q. You should be able to see that in the position basis, the delta functions are the eigenfunctions of multiplication by x and their eigenvalues are equal to their position.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, that's very helpful.
 
Look at the 2 formulas for the expectation of the position operator:
<br /> \langle \hat{x} \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{x \, \psi^{\ast}(x) \, \psi(x) \, dx} = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\psi^{\ast}(x) \, \hat{x} \, \psi(x) \, dx}<br />
This has to be true for all possible wave functions. Comparing the 2, we conclude that:
<br /> \hat{x} \, \psi(x) = x \, \psi(x)<br />
This is generally true for every operator in its own eigenbasis representation.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K