MHB Rationalize expression (5+2√6)/(7+4√3)

  • Thread starter Thread starter parry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
AI Thread Summary
To rationalize the expression (5+2√6)/(7+4√3), the first step is to multiply both the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator, which is (7-4√3). This process eliminates the square root in the denominator, making it easier to express the fraction in the form a-b√3. After performing the multiplication and simplifying, the values of a and b can be determined. The discussion emphasizes the importance of starting with the rationalization technique to solve the problem effectively.
parry
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
5+2 root 6 / 7+4root3 = a-b root3 find a and b
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB! (Wave)

I've moved this thread to our elementary algebra forum, since this is a better fit for the problem and I've give the thread a descriptive title. We are given:

$$\frac{5+2\sqrt{6}}{7+4\sqrt{3}}=a-b\sqrt{3}$$

And instructed to find $a$ and $b$. Do you have any work to show or thoughts on how to begin?
 
Start by "rationalizing the denominator". That is, multiply both numerator and denominator of [math]\frac{5+ 2\sqrt{6}}{7+ 4\sqrt{3}}[/math] by [math]7- 4\sqrt{3}[/math].
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top