Ray transfer matrix method, I need explanations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the ray transfer matrix method, specifically the construction and interpretation of the matrix elements A, B, C, and D in the context of optical systems. The user seeks clarification on the notation used in Wikipedia, particularly regarding the evaluation of A and D when applying the paraxial approximation. The user successfully deduces the expressions for A, B, and C but struggles with understanding why D is defined as D = θ₂/θ₁ when x₁ = 0. This highlights a common challenge in optics related to the linear approximation of ray behavior near the optical axis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ray optics and paraxial approximation
  • Familiarity with matrix algebra and linear transformations
  • Knowledge of refractive index and its role in optical systems
  • Basic concepts of thick lenses and optical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the ray transfer matrix for different optical elements
  • Learn about the implications of the paraxial approximation in optical design
  • Explore examples of ray transfer matrices for thick lenses and other optical systems
  • Investigate the relationship between ray transfer matrices and optical system performance
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, optical engineers, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of ray transfer matrix analysis in optical systems.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,931
Reaction score
281

Homework Statement


I can't understand my class notes nor wikipedia about this.
It's very important to know how to construct the ray transfer matrix since it allows to solve many thick lenses problems.

In wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_transfer_matrix_analysis#Definition_of_the_ray_transfer_matrix, I do not understand what they mean by A = {x_2 \over x_1 } \bigg|_{\theta_1 = 0}.
I don't understand the notation.
I can't even find the ray transfer matrix for a ray passing through a medium of refractive index=n (one of the most simple case I guess).

Can someone explain me what does the notation mean?

So that I can derive all the examples in the wikipedia page and solve a lot of exercises.
Thanks a lot... and sorry for being slow. I've also checked in Hecht's book, but I didn't understand most of it. As I said, I've absolutely NO IDEA about how to find the ray transfer matrix of the most simple cases.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I now understand a bit better. We have to assume that the rays entering an optic system can be described by a linear approximation (that is, if the rays are close enough to the optical axis).
In that case we can write \begin{bmatrix} x_2 \\ \theta _2 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} A & B \\ C & D \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x_1 \\ \theta _1 \end{bmatrix}.
Thus x_2=Ax_1+B \theta _1 and \theta _2=Cx_1 +D \theta _1.
Wikipedia's notation means that A=\frac{x_2- B \theta _1}{x_1} evaluated in \theta _1=0 (because of the paraxial rays approximation) and we reach A=\frac{x_2}{x_1}.
I have no problem understanding how to get A, B and C. But D really is an obstacle.

We have that D=\frac{\theta _2 - Cx_2}{\theta _1}. According to wikipedia, if we set x_1 =0, we reach D=\frac{\theta _2}{\theta _1}. Why is it so? If they meant x_2=0 I would understand, but x_1?
I would appreciate an explanation about how to reach D.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
869