Rayleigh Criterion or Resolving Power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sastronaut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Rayleigh
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparison of the diffraction limits of the Hubble Space Telescope and a hypothetical 100-meter radio telescope. The Hubble, with a diameter of 2.4 meters, observes light at a wavelength of 500nm, while the larger telescope observes radio waves at a wavelength of 21cm. The Rayleigh Criterion, which defines the resolving power of telescopes, is confirmed to be equivalent to resolving power, with the relevant equation being (2.5x10^5)(wavelength of light/diameter of telescope).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Rayleigh Criterion
  • Knowledge of diffraction limits in optics
  • Familiarity with telescope specifications and measurements
  • Basic principles of wave physics, particularly regarding wavelengths
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Rayleigh Criterion in detail and its applications in astronomy
  • Research the differences in resolving power between optical and radio telescopes
  • Explore the implications of telescope size on observational capabilities
  • Learn about the design and construction of large radio telescopes
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, optical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of telescope design and the physics of light and radio waves.

Sastronaut
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I must compare the diffraction limit of the Hubble telescope (2.4 meter) observing 500nm and a 100m telescope observing radiowaves with a wavelength of 21cm. I am asked to then explain why radio telescopes must be bigger!

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I understand why it must be larger (The wavelength of radio light is much larger than optical (on the scales of meters as opposed to nm), so to be able to resolve objects with small angular sizes, you have to use a much larger telescope), but my question pertains to Rayleigh Criterion. My professor never taught us this. My question is Rayleigh Criterion the same as RP power. The equation given to use for resolving power is (2.5x10^5)(wavelength of light/diameter of telescope)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sastronaut said:

Homework Statement



I must compare the diffraction limit of the Hubble telescope (2.4 meter) observing 500nm and a 100m telescope observing radiowaves with a wavelength of 21cm. I am asked to then explain why radio telescopes must be bigger!

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I understand why it must be larger (The wavelength of radio light is much larger than optical (on the scales of meters as opposed to nm), so to be able to resolve objects with small angular sizes, you have to use a much larger telescope), but my question pertains to Rayleigh Criterion. My professor never taught us this. My question is Rayleigh Criterion the same as RP power. The equation given to use for resolving power is (2.5x10^5)(wavelength of light/diameter of telescope)

Yes, the Rayleigh Criterion is the same as resolving power. Just compare (wavelength)/(diameter) in both of your cases.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
5K