Chemistry Reacting anisole with concentrated H2SO4

  • Thread starter Thread starter tellmesomething
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The reaction of anisole with concentrated H2SO4 primarily involves aromatic sulfonation, where sulfur trioxide acts as the electrophile. H2SO4 does not decompose but deprotonates, and it does not hydrate aromatic rings like it does with alkenes due to the stability of aromaticity. Cleavage of ethers typically requires halogen acids to produce halogenated products, which is not the case with H2SO4. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the mechanism of aromatic sulfonation for clarity. Overall, the reaction highlights the unique reactivity of aromatic compounds in the presence of strong acids.
tellmesomething
Messages
436
Reaction score
66
Homework Statement
Can someone explain to me how this mechanism works, and why wouldn't h+ be generated and attack the ortho para electron rich sites in anisole? It seems it breaks as OH- and So3H+ but mostly reactions we had done before had H+ breaking, how do I decide how the acid breaks? ( I thought since H is attached to O its very acidic and would always give us a supply of hydronium ions)
Relevant Equations
.
.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What mechanism?
 
mjc123 said:
What mechanism?
I have stated in the title. Reacting anisole with conc. H2so4..
 
Not sure what you mean. H2SO4 doesnt decompose when acting as a normal acid; it deprotonates completely into one equivalent and partially into a second equivalent.

The cleavage of ethers with strong acids is known, but usually a halogen acid (HCl, HBr, HI) most be used to generate a halogenated product (halomethane in the case of anisole). H2SO4 wont hydrate aromatic rings like it does alkenes since aromaticity changes the reactivity and nature of the double bonds.

Your question is a bit unclear so I hope this answers it.
 
I assume you're doing an aromatic sulfonation? If you google "aromatic sulfonation mechanism" you'll get various diagrams. There's different ways of depicting it; I think the most clear to me is just to consider sulfur trioxide as your electrophile (sulfuric acid, especially when concentrated, can for some purposes be thought of as a solution of sulfur trioxide)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top