nuclear420
- 17
- 0
My professor told me that the neutrons in a reactor see the surface area of nuclei, and not the the projected cross section. That really doesn't make intuitive sense. Is he right?
That really depends on the energy of the neutron. For high energy (MeV range) neutrons, e.g., those emitted during fission, the one considers 'potential scattering'. At much lower (thermal) energies, < 1 eV, and particularly in the 0.025 eV range, then the cross-section is more or less determined by the nature of the particular nucleus encountered. That's were QM play becomes dominant. In between though (1 eV-10 keV range), QM is a factor in resonance scattering/absorption.nuclear420 said:My professor told me that the neutrons in a reactor see the surface area of nuclei, and not the the projected cross section. That really doesn't make intuitive sense. Is he right?
\nuclear420 said:My professor told me that the neutrons in a reactor see the surface area of nuclei, and not the the projected cross section. That really doesn't make intuitive sense. Is he right?
Clem-clem said:\
I don't think he was talking about the size of the cross section, which depends on details other than the effective area. Possibly what he meant was that the slow neutrons are in an L=0 (spherically symmetric) state with respect to the nucleus so they interact at the entire surface.